Tag: PLoS Genetics

^{Type
post

Date
April 29, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Origin of Life
Tagged
, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, cancer, Casey Luskin, Darwin lobby, Darwinists, Douglas Axe, echolocation, functional information, gene duplication, genes, information, innovation, intelligent design, PLoS Genetics, purifying selection, RNA world, Science (journal), transposons, unguided processes}

Information from Nothing? Darwinists Must Believe It

_{Science & Culture
April 29, 2021

Evolution, Origin of Life

10}

Some evolutionists are becoming bolder in their assertions that information can arise from stochastic processes without intelligence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
May 30, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Asa Gray, bacteria, cancer, cells, chance, Charles Darwin, evolution, genes, Harvard University, Michael Denton, microbes, Modern Synthesis, mutagenesis, mutations, neo-Darwinian theory, organisms, PLoS Genetics, wind}

PLOS Genetics Asks: “What Is a Mutation?”

_{Paul Nelson
May 30, 2019

Evolution

2}

What if there is genuine directionality in mutation? An important paper addresses the subject. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, blood-clotting cascade, Cambridge University Press, chloroquine, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, E. coli, Ernst Mayr, evolution, exaptation, Finding Darwin's God, gene duplication, hemoglobin, Hox genes, Kenneth Miller, Long Term Evolution Experiment, mammals, mutations, Nathan Lents, natural selection, neo-Darwinian evolution, olfaction, PLoS Genetics, primates, Response to Criticism, ribose, Richard Lenski, Robert L. Summers, Russell Doolittle, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), The Edge of Evolution, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Train Wreck of a Review: A Response to Lenski et al. in Science

_{Michael Behe
February 14, 2019

Evolution

30}

Richard Lenski has spent decades overseeing the most extensive, most acclaimed laboratory evolution experiment conducted to date. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 3, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Paleontology
Tagged
, __edited, devolution, extinction, extrapolation, fossils, genome sequencing, PLoS Genetics, woolly mammoth}

Evolution in Action? The End of the Woolly Mammoth

_{David Klinghoffer
March 3, 2017

Evolution, Genetics, Paleontology

4}

Prehistoric creatures don't come any more poignant than mammoths. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 26, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __k-review, common ancestor, DNA, evolution, phylogenetic tree, PLoS Genetics, Tree of Life}

Primate Phylogenetics Researchers Swinging from Tree to Tree

_{Casey Luskin
April 26, 2011

Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology

5}

Researchers trying to create a primate phylogenetic tree are finding it isn't as easy as they'd hoped. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
December 20, 2008

Categories
Science Education
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, Judge Jones, PLoS Genetics, University of California San Francisco}

Judge Jones and His Groupies

_{John G. West
December 20, 2008

Science Education, Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

2}

Earlier this month, the peer-reviewed science journal PloS Genetics published its latest earth-shaking contribution to the field of genetics: a personal interview with none other than Judge John Jones of Kitzmiller v. Dover fame. The interview was conducted by Jane Gitschier of the Institute for Human Genetics at the University of California San Francisco, who gushes over the Judge like a school-girl with a crush on her teacher. The non-scientist might be forgiven for thinking that a journal bearing a name like PLoS Genetics would restrict its articles to, well, genetics… or at least, to biology… or at the very least, to science. Not to worry! If the article extols Judge Jones, a lack of scientific content apparently is no Read More ›