Tag: biologists | Page 12 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 21, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, atheism, bears, biologists, Center for Science and Culture, deadline, Discovery Institute, evolution, fossil record, Jerry Coyne, Jonathan Wells, Richard Sternberg, Robert Crowther, webinar, whales, Zoom}

Whale Evolution — Believe It or Not? Register by Thursday for Webinar with Sternberg and Wells!

_{David Klinghoffer
April 21, 2020

Biology, Evolution

2}

Prominent atheist biologist Jerry Coyne calls whale fossils “one of our best examples of an evolutionary transition.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 13, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, bears, biologists, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Darwin, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, evolution, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, On the Origin of Species, Richard Sternberg, scientists, U.C. Berkeley, webinar, whales, Yale University, Zoom}

Zoom Webinar with Wells, Sternberg on Whale Evolution; Join Us on April 23!

_{Science & Culture
April 13, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

Charles Darwin wrote: “I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits…” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
April 3, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __k-review, Alexander Oparin, biological information, biologists, chance, chemical evolution, Claude Shannon, complexity, DNA, functional specificity, intelligent design, living cells, natural selection, RNA, specification, specified complexity}

Evidence of Intelligent Design in the Origin of Life

_{Stephen C. Meyer
April 3, 2020

Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

4}

As the pioneering chemical evolutionary theorist Alexander Oparin put it, “The problem of the nature of life and the problem of its origin have become inseparable.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 5, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Life Sciences
Tagged
, __edited, biologists, Darwin Devolves, devolution, DNA, E. coli, evolution, hydrogen peroxide, mutations, Nature Ecology and Evolution, Richard Lenski, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, University of Michigan}

Helpful Devolutionary Mutations Are Rapid and Unavoidable: Paper Reinforces Darwin Devolves

_{Michael Behe
March 5, 2020

Evolution, Life Sciences

7}

There is simply no way for any unguided, unintelligent account of the unfolding of life to avoid the bane of helpful degradative mutations. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 5, 2020

Categories
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, academic freedom, Arizona State University, atheism, Ball State University, biologists, blasphemy, bullying, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, Darwinism, education, Eric Hedin, evolution, Free Science, freedom from religion foundation, Genesis, Gerd B. Müller, Granville Sewell, gravity, heresy, Jerry Coyne, Journal of Molecular Biology, London, Michael Lynch, Natural History Museum, New York State, pedagogy, religion, Royal Society, Sarah Chaffee, Supreme Court, U.S. Constitution}

Blasphemy Against Darwin in New York State! Atheist Group Intimidates School District

_{David Klinghoffer
March 5, 2020

Science Education, Scientific Freedom

7}

First, it is definitely NOT against either federal law or Supreme Court precedent to teach about scientific criticisms of Darwin’s theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 19, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Alvin Plantinga, biologists, Boston Review, Charles Darwin, chloroquine, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian processes, Darwinists, designer, function, genes, H. Allen Orr, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John McDonald, lungs, Michael Behe, Mount Rushmore, mouse, mousetrap, philosophers, Purdue University, The Design Inference, The Edge of Evolution, Where the Conflict Really Lies, William A. Dembski}

Philosophical-ish Objections to Intelligent Design: A Response to Paul Draper

_{Michael Behe
February 19, 2020

Intelligent Design

22}

Recently I was asked by several people whether I had ever responded to an old review of my book Darwin’s Black Box. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 12, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, atheism, biologists, cells, Charles Darwin, Darwin Day, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, Discovery Institute, evolution, Evolution News, evolutionary biology, intelligent design, Lehigh University, materialists, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, microbiology, peer review, Secrets of the Cell with Michael Behe, social media, video}

Darwin Day Is Here! Discover the Cell’s Secrets with Michael Behe

_{David Klinghoffer
February 12, 2020

Intelligent Design

3}

Today, for the birthday of Charles Darwin, celebrated around the world as Darwin Day, Discovery Institute is proud to launch a new, five-part video series. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
February 11, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, biologists, contingency, Dave Speijer, evolutionary theory, predictions, puppy, Stephen Jay Gould, theory, universal common descent}

“Is Popperian Falsification Useful in Biology?”

_{Paul Nelson
February 11, 2020

Biology, Evolution

2}

A theory that “tolerates exceptions” is doing no work at all, simply wandering along behind the data like a puppy on a leash. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 31, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, biologists, Brian Miller, evolution, evolutionists, failed predictions, forest, ID the Future, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, naturalism, Paul Nelson, podcast, scientific theories, Teilhard de Chardin, theistic evolution, Tree of Life, universal common descent}

A Forest, Not a Tree? Nelson Asks Why Universal Common Descent Needn’t “Pay” for Failures

_{David Klinghoffer
January 31, 2020

Evolution

2}

Maybe life is not a tree but, as biologists are finding to be increasingly likely, a forest or an orchard. But then what are the consequences for strict naturalism? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 31, 2020

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __edited, Arizona State University, atheism, biologists, Christians, Discovery Institute, Evangelical Christians, Federal Government, fundamentalists, Jerry Coyne, National Science Foundation, PLOS ONE, prejudice, PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins, Roman Catholic, scientists}

No, Really? Scientists Find Anti-Christian Prejudice in the Science World

_{David Klinghoffer
January 31, 2020

Faith & Science

5}

The statement that “scientists call” this group “fundamentalist and/or evangelical” makes it sounds as if that is an objective, scientific label. Read More ›