Tag: Ann Gauger | Page 12 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 24, 2018

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, critics, Darwin Devolves, DNA, evolution, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Michael Behe, Peaceful Science, S. Joshua Swamidass, scientific establishment, The Edge of Evolution, Uncommon Descent, Washington University}

Michael Behe and His Critics

_{David Klinghoffer
November 24, 2018

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

If the past is any guide, where the critics are substantive rather than snarky or patronizing, we’re in for a good debate. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
November 2, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, Asa Gray, Associated Press, common descent, intelligent design, LUCA, Michael Behe, Mount Everest, topology, universal common descent}

Intelligent Design, Common Descent, and an Ascent of Mount Everest

_{Paul Nelson
November 2, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

Did four-year-old Angela climb Everest by herself? No way. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 5, 2018

Categories
Chemistry
Engineering
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, creationism, directed evolution, Douglas Axe, education, evolution, Frances Arnold, intelligent design, Matti Leisola, media, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), New York Times, Nobel Prize}

Word Games with Evolutionists

_{David Klinghoffer
October 5, 2018

Chemistry, Engineering, Evolution

2}

Coming from the National Center for Science Education or the New York Times, this is typical. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 26, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, citations, Colin Reeves, Denis Lamoureux, dialogue, Evolution News, evolutionary science, Review, S. Joshua Swamidass, science, theistic evolution, theology, Washington University}

Response to Swamidass: Sniffing at 700+ Citations of Mainstream Scientific Literature

_{Science & Culture
September 26, 2018

Evolution, Faith & Science

2}

He focuses on one subtopic of one chapter, dismissing the rest of the scientific content of the book as failing to engage with mainstream science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 25, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, chimpanzees, common ancestor, common ancestry, Darwin's Doubt, evolutionary biology, genetic data, humans, Journal of Molecular Evolution, mice, Molecular Biology and Evolution, molecular clock, Nature (journal), organisms, rats, S. Joshua Swamidass, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution, Y chromosome}

Response to Swamidass: Rats, Mice, and Discrepant Molecular Clocks

_{Science & Culture
September 25, 2018

Evolution, Faith & Science

15}

Molecular clocks are a relatively simple concept. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 24, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, chimpanzees, Colin Reeves, common ancestor, common descent, common design, Darwinian mechanism, David Snoke, DNA, genetic similarity, genome, humans, mice, molecular clock, Ola Hössjer, population genetics, rats, S. Joshua Swamidass, theistic evolution, Washington University, Winston Ewert}

Response to Swamidass: Confusion in a Review of Theistic Evolution

_{Science & Culture
September 24, 2018

Evolution, Faith & Science

8}

It’s worth engaging him, since Swamidass is the relatively rare critic of ID who works at tackling arguments for design in a substantive fashion. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 18, 2018

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, Australia, bacteria, chess, cosmic fine-tuning, David Barash, electrons, evolutionary biology, Goldilocks, gratitude, human brain, intelligent design, mice, neutrons, New York Times, poetry, primates, soul, universe, University of Washington, viruses, wisdom}

Was Universe Designed for Hairy-Nosed Wombats?

_{David Klinghoffer
September 18, 2018

Physical Sciences

4}

David Barash is an evolutionary biologist known for delivering a yearly talk to his students disabusing them of the idea that science can be reconciled with religious faith. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 12, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Africa, Ajit Varki, Ann Gauger, cheetahs, Darwinism, Death Valley, DNA, Elizabeth Pennisi, evolution, gene, humans, ID the Future, mice, Michael Behe, primates, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Science Magazine, The Edge of Evolution, UC San Diego}

Origin of Long-Distance Running — More Evolution by Breaking Things

_{David Klinghoffer
September 12, 2018

Evolution

4}

A central problem for theories of unguided evolution has always been the challenge of building complex biological novelties. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
August 27, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, BioLogos, C.S. Lewis, cancer, Douglas Axe, evolution, gain of function, intelligent design, John Cairns, Jonathan Wells, Michael Behe, Michael Lynch, mutations, Nature Genetics, pathogens, Peaceful Science, S. Joshua Swamidass, The Edge of Evolution, theistic evolution, tumor}

Swamidass: Cancer “Can Innovate”

_{Science & Culture
August 27, 2018

Intelligent Design, Medicine

8}

Cancer proves evolution only insofar as one forgets, or pretends not to know, what evolution is supposed to explain. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
July 23, 2018

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Physics
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, bacteria, Christianity, Darwinian, evolution, faith, finches, Finding Darwin's God, fossil record, genes, Günter Bechly, Günter Wagner, intelligent design, Kenneth Miller, materialism, Michael Behe, Research, Richard Sternberg, science, Seattle, Summer Seminars, theism, whales}

Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design Expand Students’ Intellectual Horizons

_{Brian Miller
July 23, 2018

Biology, Intelligent Design, Mathematics, Physics, Science Education

4}

A primary reason why many biologists never question the standard evolutionary model is their very limited training in mathematics. Read More ›