Tag: citations

^{Type
post

Date
June 10, 2026

Categories
Ethics
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, academics, AI slop, artificial inteligence, arXiv, bioRxiv, citations, clinical-trial studies, fabrication, Frankencitations, hallucinations, humans, Jay Van Bavel, Nature (journal), PubMed Central, references, researchers, scholars, SSRN, systematic reviews}

In Science Research, a Plague of Phony Citations Generated by AI

_{Science & Culture
June 10, 2026

Ethics, Scientific Reasoning

2}

Ironically, the public has been taught to worry that AI is taking over and will do everything better than humans. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
September 3, 2025

Categories
Ethics
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, cancel culture, citations, dissent, equity, geography, language, languages, minorities, Nature (journal), private truth, Research, scholars, transparency}

Oh, Brother: Now It’s Bringing “Equity” to Scientific Citations

_{Denyse O’Leary
September 3, 2025

Ethics, Scientific Reasoning

6}

Some want “papers to include the proportions of citations in terms of the gender and race or ethnicity of the referenced authors.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
August 6, 2025

Categories
Ethics
Evolution
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, artificial inteligence, citations, government, misconduct, Moore’s law, Northwestern University, PNAS, publications, science, science fraud, scientific literature, scientific process, standards, technology, trust}

Fraudulent Science Networks Outpace Legitimate Science

_{Science & Culture
August 6, 2025

Ethics, Evolution, Neuroscience & Mind

3}

"Before the public loses confidence in the scientific process"? Hasn't that train already left the station? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
March 17, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biology textbooks, Center for Science and Culture, citations, classrooms, Darwinian paradigm, Discovery Institute, embryos, Ernst Haeckel, evolution, finches, Haeckel’s embryos, Icons of Evolution, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, peppered moths, podcast, reputation}

Dismantling the Icons of Evolution

_{Andrew McDiarmid
March 17, 2025

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

I invited Dr. Casey Luskin to share some of his memories of our longtime colleague Dr. Jonathan Wells, who recently passed away at 82 years old. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Emily Reeves

Date
December 19, 2023

Categories
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Technology
Tagged
, actuators, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, citations, critical thinking, dragonflies, Energy, engineers, flatworms, grasshoppers, innovation, intelligent design, mantis shrimp, Stuart Burgess, wings}

Paper Digest: Ten Biomechanical Animal Joints Enable Extreme Performance

_{Emily Reeves
December 19, 2023

Intelligent Design, Life Sciences, Technology

7}

The amazing design structures in organisms provide engineers with inspiring templates for creating better products. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert F. Shedinger

Date
March 20, 2023

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Tagged
, abolitionist movement, Adrian Desmond, Cambridge, Charles Darwin, citations, Darwin’s Sacred Cause, Down House, England, evolution, historiography, James Moore, John Stuart Mill, Louis Agassiz, Racism, Sacred Cause (series), slavery}

Darwin and the “Eyre Affair”: A Speculative Tale

_{Robert Shedinger
March 20, 2023

Bioethics, Evolution

8}

October 7, 1865, saw a revolt break out in Jamaica in which 18 officials and militia men were killed by members of the freed black population. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 26, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, citations, Colin Reeves, Denis Lamoureux, dialogue, Evolution News, evolutionary science, Review, S. Joshua Swamidass, science, theistic evolution, theology, Washington University}

Response to Swamidass: Sniffing at 700+ Citations of Mainstream Scientific Literature

_{Science & Culture
September 26, 2018

Evolution, Faith & Science

2}

He focuses on one subtopic of one chapter, dismissing the rest of the scientific content of the book as failing to engage with mainstream science. Read More ›