Tag: Ann Gauger | Page 9 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
November 12, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, Charles Darwin, Christianity Today, Congress, Darwinism, Evangelical Christians, Evolution News, naturalism, Ola Hössjer, Phillip E. Johnson, PragerU, Santorum Amendment, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution, U.S. Constitution}

More on Christianity Today and Phillip Johnson’s Legacy in Science Education and Law

_{Casey Luskin
November 12, 2019

Evolution, Science Education

9}

If he could speak to us now, Johnson might remark that his 2019 obituary shows how times have changed — and not necessarily for the better. Read More ›

Bible. Old Testament. Creation. Genesis. God created Adam and Eve and provided all they needed in the Garden of Eden.

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
November 4, 2019

Categories
Genetics
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, alleles, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, butterfly, Christians, common ancestry, computer model, Darwinists, Dennis Venema, DNA, dog, genes, genetic instructions, Harvard University, human origins, Jews, Muslims, Neanderthals, Ola Hössjer, population genetics, Research, Stockholm University}

“Unique Human Origins”: Explained

_{Jonathan Witt
November 4, 2019

Genetics, Human Origins and Anthropology

5}

One scenario involves a first human pair created from scratch — Adam and Eve, as many traditional religious believers would have it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 29, 2019

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, Adam and the Genome, algorithms, Ann Gauger, atheism, BIO-Complexity, BioLogos, bottleneck, Christianity Today, Christians, Dennis Venema, DNA, fingerprints, first couple, genetic data, Jews, Ola Hössjer, population genetics, University of Stockholm}

From Ann Gauger and Ola Hössjer, a New Standard for the Science of a “First Couple”

_{David Klinghoffer
October 29, 2019

Human Origins and Anthropology

7}

Their scrupulous work found that Jerry Coyne and others, in bullying Christians and Jews on how “we can dismiss a physical Adam and Eve with near scientific certainty,” were in reality poorly supported. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
October 28, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, Andrew McDiarmid, Ann Gauger, ATP, causal circularity, evolution, ID the Future, intelligent design}

Gauger on Evolution’s Causal Circularity Problem: “Chickens and Eggs, All the Way Down”

_{Science & Culture
October 28, 2019

Evolution

1}

Cells can’t make life-essential ATP, NAD, and other metabolic co-factors without having ATP, NAD, and the other co-factors there first. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
October 24, 2019

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, Austria, Brian Miller, Cambrian Explosion, causal circularity, Douglas Axe, ethology, fossil record, German, Günter Bechly, Homo (genus), Homo floresiensis, Homo luzonensis, intelligent design, Martin Nowak, Michael Chaberek, Michael Denton, neo-Darwinian model, Ola Hössjer, proteins, Siegfried Scherer, Stephen Meyer, teleology, Thomas Aquinas, waiting-time problem}

Watch: Videos Now Available from the Recent ID Conference In Austria

_{Günter Bechly
October 24, 2019

Biology, Intelligent Design

14}

Several prominent members of the ID movement presented talks at the conference, including Stephen Meyer, Ann Gauger, Michael Denton, and Brian Miller. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
October 21, 2019

Categories
Genetics
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, 1000 Genomes Project, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, Darwin, human evolution, human origins, Ola Hössjer, population genetics}

New BIO-Complexity Paper: We Could Have Come from Two

_{Ann Gauger
October 21, 2019

Genetics, Human Origins and Anthropology

12}

New research confirms the possibility of a starting point of two humans instead of thousands. Ann Gauger reports. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
October 10, 2019

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, blood vessels, Boston, creation myth, Darwinism, Design Inference, evolution, intelligent design, literature, lungs, Nobel Prize, oxygen, red blood cells, reverse-engineering, scientists, teachers}

It’s Another Great Nobel Year for Design

_{Michael Egnor
October 10, 2019

Biology, Chemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

And a bad year for a 19th-century creation myth. It’s understandable that Darwinists are a bit dejected. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
August 18, 2019

Categories
Anatomy
Biology
Evolution
Human Exceptionalism
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, behavior, chimpanzees, culture, Darwinian mechanisms, Human Evolution (journal), humans, ID the Future, mutations, physiology, podcast, Sarah Chaffee, Wesley Smith}

More on How Chimps and Humans Differ: Anatomy and Behavior

_{Science & Culture
August 18, 2019

Anatomy, Biology, Evolution, Human Exceptionalism, Human Origins and Anthropology

1}

It seems obvious: humans and chimps differ markedly. But as Wesley Smith noted yesterday, it is not so obvious to the editors of Human Evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 28, 2019

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, chimpanzees, DNA, gene expression, genome, humans, ID the Future, podcast, proteins, Sarah Chaffee, splicing}

More on How Chimps and Humans Differ: Human-Specific Genes

_{Science & Culture
July 28, 2019

Human Origins and Anthropology

1}

“We don’t splice our RNA the same way chimps do,” says biologist Dr. Ann Gauger, continuing a conversation with host Sarah Chaffee. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 21, 2019

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, chimpanzees, DNA, humans, Sarah Chaffee, Science and Human Origins}

Listen: At the Genetic Level, How Chimps and Humans Differ

_{Science & Culture
July 21, 2019

Human Origins and Anthropology

1}

Do we have 99 percent of our DNA in common with chimps? Read More ›