Category: Genetics | Page 8 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
April 13, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Tagged
, Darwinism, English, evolutionary theory, genes, German, intelligent design, interview, Italian, Marco Respinti, Max Planck Institute, Michael Behe, mutations, radiation, scientists, selection, Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig}

A New Interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

_{Granville Sewell
April 13, 2021

Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences

2}

To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
January 25, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Genetics
Tagged
, abortion, cattle, Center on Human Exceptionalism, Discovery Institute, economics, eugenics, Jay Richards, law, Politicians, scientists, specialists, The Price of Panic, Wesley J. Smith}

The Arrogant Mistake that Is Scientism

_{Jonathan Witt
January 25, 2021

Bioethics, Ethics, Genetics

2}

The tweet reads, “Imagine a world is ruled by scientists, not by politicians.” The drift of the tweet appeared to be, wouldn’t that be wonderful! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
October 18, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Darwinian evolution, Darwinism, evolution, ID the Future, paradigm shift, podcast, Science, The Miracle of the Cell}

Michael Denton: When Paradigms Shifts

_{Science and Culture
October 18, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design

1}

Dr. Denton reflects on paradigm shifts that he’s witnessed, how his own thinking has changed, and how these shifts challenge Darwinian evolution in new ways. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Richard Sternberg

Date
April 3, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __k-review, axioms, Carmen Sapienza, chromosomes, DNA, Drosophila melanogaster, euchromatin, Francis Crick, fruit flies, heterochromatin, junk DNA, Leslie Orgel, nucleus, organism, phenotype, repetitive sequences, Richard Dawkins, RNA, The Selfish Gene, transposable elements, W. Ford Doolittle, Y chromosome}

The “Why” of the Fly “Y”: Reflections on “Junk” DNA

_{Richard Sternberg
April 3, 2020

Evolution, Genetics

7}

Let us give some thought to the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, that engaging fly which is the bond-servant of genetics. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 11, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Thaxton, Douglas Axe, evolution, genes, homologues, ID the Future, Illustra Media, junk DNA, Metazoa, natural selection, Nature Communications, non-coding DNA, orphan genes, Paul Nelson, probability, proto-genes, Roger Olsen, The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Trinity College Dublin, Walter Bradley}

Researchers: It Exists; Therefore, It Evolved

_{Science and Culture
March 11, 2020

Biology, Evolution, Genetics

8}

According to some reporters and Darwinists, evolutionary theory today needs no more confirmation than existence. Evolution is a fact, remember? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Flannery

Date
March 4, 2020

Categories
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, Auguste Comte, biological systems, cryo-electron microscopy, Darwin on Trial, Darwin's Black Box, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Hilary Putnam, history of id, intelligent design, John C. Eccles, logical positivism, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Michael Polanyi, modeling, molecular biology, Neo-Darwinism, Pajaro Dunes, Phillip E. Johnson, scientific reductionism, Vienna Circle}

What Precipitated the Intelligent Design Movement?

_{Michael Flannery
March 4, 2020

Genetics, Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science

3}

Here are some thoughts prompted by a rather curious question posed to me in an email, namely, “What were the findings that most helped ID since the turn of the millennium?” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 19, 2020

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Genetics
Tagged
, __edited, abortion, alphabet soup, atheism, China, Darwinism, David Curtis, eugenics, human beings, intelligent design, John Zmirak, materialism, morality, one-child policy, pregnancy, Richard Dawkins, selective breeding, The Stream, unborn, William Shakespeare}

But Why Not Go For It with Human Eugenics?

_{David Klinghoffer
February 19, 2020

Bioethics, Ethics, Genetics

3}

“It’s my opinion” is not a strong ground on which to take a moral stand. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 8, 2020

Categories
Genetics
Life Sciences
Tagged
, __edited, coincidences, Energy, ID the Future, improbability, intelligent design, light, Michael Denton, oxygen, photosynthesis, podcast, water}

Michael Denton: Remarkable Coincidences in Photosynthesis

_{Science and Culture
February 8, 2020

Genetics, Life Sciences

1}

From the specific energy of visible light to the unique properties of water, this degree of improbability screams DESIGN. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
December 31, 2019

Categories
Genetics
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, 1000 Genomes Project, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, Darwin, human evolution, human origins, Ola Hössjer, population genetics}

#2 of Our Top Stories of 2019: BIO-Complexity Paper Shows We Could Have Come from Two

_{Ann Gauger
December 31, 2019

Genetics, Human Origins and Anthropology

13}

New research confirms the possibility of a starting point of two humans instead of thousands. Ann Gauger reports. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
November 26, 2019

Categories
Genetics
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, atheism, BIO-Complexity, chimpanzees, Darwinism, Discovery Institute Press, DNA, entomologists, Francisco Ayala, HLA-DRB1, hominins, human origins, insects, Jay Richards, linkage disequilibrium, Neo-Darwinism, Ola Hössjer, Science and Human Origins, theism}

Human Origins: Not a Simple Question

_{Ann Gauger
November 26, 2019

Genetics, Human Origins and Anthropology

13}

Is this proof of Adam and Eve? Far from it. It merely shows they might be possible. This model is scientific and as such is falsifiable. Read More ›