Category: Scientific Freedom | Page 13 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
November 20, 2020

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, bureaucracy, evolution, Evolution News, free speech, intelligent design, newspapers, readers, scientific materialism, totalitarianism, truth}

In the Evolution Debate, How Truth Can Prevail

_{Brian Miller
November 20, 2020

Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

4}

Paul Kecskemeti’s analysis perfectly describes the challenge faced by anyone who wishes to publicly tell the truth about the evidence for design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
November 17, 2020

Categories
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Ann Gauger, apes, Central America, Darwinists, despair, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Guillermo Gonzalez, Günter Bechly, Jonathan Wells, journalism, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, morality, religion, Richard Dawkins, Science, Spanish, Stephen Meyer, young people}

The Solution to Fake News about Intelligent Design

_{John G. West
November 17, 2020

Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

3}

Just a few days ago, a former atheist endorsed Evolution News as the “best place” to read about topics relating to science, design, Darwinism, and faith. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 29, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, ACLU, atheism, biological origins, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinism, David Gelernter, free speech, Granville Sewell, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Michael Denton, narrative, peer-reviewed literature, Richard Dawkins, Royal Society, Scott Adams, Stephen Meyer, The Miracle of the Cell, University of Chicago, Why Evolution Is True}

Inside the Evolution Silo — Darwinism as a Cult

_{David Klinghoffer
October 29, 2020

Evolution, Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

4}

A major news story can break outside of the silo but, because it goes against the narrative, those in the silo will never hear about it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 26, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Aryans, creationists, editors, Evolution News, Free Science, Humanize, intelligent design, Jews, Journal of Theoretical Biology, journals, medical ethics, Nature (journal), Nazi Germany, Richard Sternberg, Science (journal), scientific debate, scientific method, Stephen Meyer, The New England Journal of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Wesley Smith}

Ethicist Protests Politicized Science — Alas, That Horse Left the Barn Long Ago

_{David Klinghoffer
October 26, 2020

Scientific Freedom

4}

It is all about the costs of getting on the wrong side of the power structure. To say that this “chills” debate about scientific issues is an understatement. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 26, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, Answers in Genesis, Communism, creationism, Darwinism, disclaimer, Discovery Institute, discrimination, Due Process Clause, Elsevier, free speech, Institute for Creation Research, intelligent design, Jews, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Martin Gaskell, Medieval Europe, Nature (journal), Nazi Germany, Neo-Darwinism, Norway, peer-reviewed literature, Science (journal), scientific journals, Soviet Union, Stockholm University, Supreme Court, Sweden, University of Kentucky}

Intelligent Design’s Yellow Star: Journal’s Disclaimer Refutes a Common Criticism of ID

_{Casey Luskin
October 26, 2020

Scientific Freedom

9}

Critics of intelligent design (ID) often lecture ID proponents that they are free to submit their work to any scientific journal. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 20, 2020

Categories
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, cancel culture, censorship, COVID-19, disclaimer, intelligent design, Journal of Theoretical Biology, molecular machines, Ola Hössjer, peer-reviewed literature, researchers, Retraction Watch, scientists, Steinar Thorvaldsen}

Journal Finds It Can’t Keep a Good Pro-ID Paper Down

_{David Klinghoffer
October 20, 2020

Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

2}

As a reader points out, the paper is the journal’s No. 1 most downloaded article, beating out several others in the Top 10 about Covid and related hot topics. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 19, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Bayesian reasoning, Communist Party, conservatism, Darwinian evolution, elections, free speech, Harvey Mudd College, intelligent design, polarization, scientists, social media}

“Castro Consensus”: Scientific Paper Takes a Fresh Look at Scientific Agreement

_{David Klinghoffer
October 19, 2020

Evolution, Scientific Freedom

4}

Evolutionary orthodoxy is maintained by a “Castro Consensus.” This makes the Darwinian consensus questionable and in need of re-examination. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 8, 2020

Categories
Biology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, Biological Information: New Perspectives, censorship, defining terms, Del Ratzsch, dependency graph, Elsevier, explanatory filter, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, macroevolution, Michael Behe, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), peer-reviewed, publishers, search engines, specified complexity, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections

_{Casey Luskin
October 8, 2020

Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

6}

The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
October 6, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Darwin on Trial, David Berlinski, evolution, Instagram, intelligent design, Islam, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Michael Ruse, Neo-Darwinism, Pittsburgh, Richard Dawkins, The College Fix, Trinity College Dublin}

Free Speech for Richard Dawkins? Absolutely!

_{Paul Nelson
October 6, 2020

Scientific Freedom

3}

In 1987, a harmless graduate student who wanted to take on the dreadful giant neo-Darwinism might be an entertaining spectacle. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
October 2, 2020

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, agriculture, Ann Gauger, cancel culture, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, creator, Darwinists, disclaimer, Discovery Institute, discrimination, Douglas Axe, Foresight (book), Günter Bechly, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Nobel laureates, Ola Hössjer, peer review, Return of the God Hypothesis, Robert J. Marks II, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, Stockholm University}

Despite Darwinists’ Cancel Culture, Intelligent Design Has a Breakthrough in Biology Journal

_{John G. West
October 2, 2020

Biology, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

3}

The article survived peer-review and was accepted for publication despite the open hostility of the journal’s top editors! Read More ›