Category: Scientific Freedom | Page 12 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 26, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, Answers in Genesis, Communism, creationism, Darwinism, disclaimer, Discovery Institute, discrimination, Due Process Clause, Elsevier, Fourteenth Amendment, free speech, Institute for Creation Research, intelligent design, Jews, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Martin Gaskell, Medieval Europe, Nature (journal), Nazi Germany, Neo-Darwinism, Norway, peer-reviewed literature, Science (journal), scientific journals, Soviet Union, Stockholm University, Supreme Court, Sweden, University of Kentucky, University of Tromsø, yellow star}

Intelligent Design’s Yellow Star: Journal’s Disclaimer Refutes a Common Criticism of ID

_{Casey Luskin
October 26, 2020

Scientific Freedom

9}

Critics of intelligent design (ID) often lecture ID proponents that they are free to submit their work to any scientific journal. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 20, 2020

Categories
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, cancel culture, censorship, COVID-19, disclaimer, intelligent design, Journal of Theoretical Biology, molecular machines, Ola Hössjer, peer-reviewed literature, researchers, Retraction Watch, scientists, Steinar Thorvaldsen}

Journal Finds It Can’t Keep a Good Pro-ID Paper Down

_{David Klinghoffer
October 20, 2020

Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

2}

As a reader points out, the paper is the journal’s No. 1 most downloaded article, beating out several others in the Top 10 about Covid and related hot topics. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 19, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Bayesian reasoning, candidates, Communist Party, conservatism, Cuba, Darwinian evolution, elections, free speech, Harvey Mudd College, independence, intelligent design, polarization, scientists, social media}

“Castro Consensus”: Scientific Paper Takes a Fresh Look at Scientific Agreement

_{David Klinghoffer
October 19, 2020

Evolution, Scientific Freedom

4}

Evolutionary orthodoxy is maintained by a “Castro Consensus.” This makes the Darwinian consensus questionable and in need of re-examination. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 8, 2020

Categories
Biology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, Akira Sasaki, Biological Information: New Perspectives, censorship, defining terms, Del Ratzsch, Denise Kirschner, dependency graph, Elsevier, explanatory filter, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, keywords, macroevolution, Mark Chaplain, Michael Behe, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), peer-reviewed, publishers, search engines, specified complexity, statistical methods, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections

_{Casey Luskin
October 8, 2020

Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

6}

The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
October 6, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Darwin on Trial, David Berlinski, Duquesne University, evolution, Instagram, intelligent design, Islam, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Michael Ruse, Neo-Darwinism, petition, Pittsburgh, Richard Dawkins, sexual assault, The College Fix, Trinity College Dublin}

Free Speech for Richard Dawkins? Absolutely!

_{Paul Nelson
October 6, 2020

Scientific Freedom

3}

In 1987, a harmless graduate student who wanted to take on the dreadful giant neo-Darwinism might be an entertaining spectacle. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
October 2, 2020

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, agriculture, Ann Gauger, cancel culture, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, creator, Darwinists, disclaimer, Discovery Institute, discrimination, Douglas Axe, Foresight (book), Günter Bechly, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Nobel laureates, Ola Hössjer, peer review, Return of the God Hypothesis, Robert J. Marks II, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, Stockholm University, The Fitness of Nature for Mankind}

Despite Darwinists’ Cancel Culture, Intelligent Design Has a Breakthrough in Biology Journal

_{John G. West
October 2, 2020

Biology, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

3}

The article survived peer-review and was accepted for publication despite the open hostility of the journal’s top editors! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 9, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, cancel culture, censorship, Charles Darwin, David Coppedge, Eric Hedin, Evolution News, Expelled (movie), Free Science, free speech, Günter Bechly, ID the Future, intelligent design, Robert Crowther, Summer Seminars, United States, William F. Buckley Jr., Willmoore Kendall, Yale University}

Free Speech and Intelligent Design’s Warning

_{David Klinghoffer
September 9, 2020

Scientific Freedom

2}

The censors came for us first, and no one protested. Now they’re coming for you. Indeed, they are coming for Charles Darwin himself. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
September 4, 2020

Categories
Origin of Life
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, biological diversity, Center for Science and Culture, education, Evolution News, Free Science, free speech, ideology, intelligent design, professors, resources, students, Tony Woodlief, Wall Street Journal}

If Your Free Speech Is Threatened, Let Us Know

_{Sarah Chaffee
September 4, 2020

Origin of Life, Science Education, Scientific Freedom

2}

As the school year starts, I’m wondering how many students and professors will find themselves in difficult positions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 2, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, “consensus science”, academic freedom, American Revolution, arson, conservatives, Darwinism, David Coppedge, Douglas Axe, free speech, French Revolution, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, John Adams, looting, Marxism, Oregon, Portland, Richard Sternberg, rioting, Scott Minnich, Stephen Meyer, The New Criterion, The Origins of Totalitarianism, Thomas Jefferson, Tony Woodlief, Wall Street Journal, Wesley Smith, William F. Buckley Jr., Willmoore Kendall, Yale University}

Why Intelligent Design Had to Be the First to Face the Guillotine

_{David Klinghoffer
September 2, 2020

Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

7}

In Wesley J. Smith’s phrase, in the present cultural moment, we have witnessed “the French Revolution attacking the American Revolution.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 1, 2020

Categories
Human Exceptionalism
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, canary in the coal mine, cancel culture, censorship, evolution, free speech, human dignity, intelligence, intelligent design, Michael Egnor, New York Magazine, race, Richard Sternberg, Rod Dreher, scientists, Smithsonian Institution, Stephen Meyer, The New Republic}

Andrew Sullivan, Meet Richard Sternberg

_{David Klinghoffer
September 1, 2020

Human Exceptionalism, Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

3}

This is another illustration of what Michael Egnor and others have said: intelligent design was the “canary in the coal mine” when it comes to cancel culture. Read More ›