falling Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 9, 2020 CategoriesBiologyFine-tuningIntelligent Design Tagged , Adam Marcus, Akira Sasaki, corruption, Denise Kirschner, disclaimer, editors, Elsevier, Evolution News, incompetence, intelligent design, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, keywords, Mark Chaplain, Ola Hössjer, publisher, reputations, Retraction Watch, science journals, scientists, Steinar Thorvaldsen Corruption Watch: Biology Journal Blames the Innocent, Turns ID Scientists into Fall Guys David Klinghoffer October 9, 2020 Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design 4 For those who are always lecturing us about “Follow the science” and “Believe the scientists,” this episode should be an eye opener. Read More ›
editors Type post Author Casey Luskin Date October 8, 2020 CategoriesBiologyFine-tuningIntelligent DesignScientific Freedom Tagged , academic freedom, Akira Sasaki, Biological Information: New Perspectives, censorship, defining terms, Del Ratzsch, Denise Kirschner, dependency graph, Elsevier, explanatory filter, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, keywords, macroevolution, Mark Chaplain, Michael Behe, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), peer-reviewed, publishers, search engines, specified complexity, statistical methods, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections Casey Luskin October 8, 2020 Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom 6 The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design. Read More ›
