Chk-UCH1-GFAP-20X-1 Type post Author Jonathan McLatchie Date February 26, 2025 CategoriesBiologyEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , BioCosmos, carbohydrates, cell adhesion, complexity, dGRNs, endoplasmic reticulum, evolution, glycans, glycosylation, glycosyltransferases, Golgi apparatus, intelligent causes, intelligent design, kidney cells, nerve cells, probabilistic resources, proteins, signaling, stochastic processes, University of Georgia New Paper Examines How the Complexity of Glycan Structures Points to Intelligent Design Jonathan McLatchie February 26, 2025 Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design 7 "This is, of course, important in order for a kidney cell to be and function as a kidney cell, a nerve cell to function as a nerve cell, and so forth." Read More ›
hawk eye Type post Author William A. Dembski Date September 2, 2022 CategoriesBiologyEvolutionScience Tagged , Conservation of Information, Darwinian theory, Darwinists, Douglas Axe, evolution, eye, flagellum, Harvard University, Jason Rosenhouse, Leo Kadanoff, physical processes, probabilities, Rosenhouse’s Whoppers (series), stochastic processes, The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism, University of Chicago Rosenhouse’s Whoppers: Probability Theory Is Irrelevant William A. Dembski September 2, 2022 Biology, Evolution, Science 4 If you deny that probabilities apply to a physical process, you’ve abjured science — you no longer have a scientific theory. Read More ›
David Berlinski 2 Type post Author Sarah Chaffee Date March 29, 2018 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent DesignScience Education Tagged , __k-review, "teach the controversy", Astrophysics for People in a Hurry, atheism, critical thinking, Darwinian theory, David Berlinski, Discovery Institute, education, evolution, intelligent design, irony, mutations, Neil deGrasse Tyson, probability, science, skepticism, stochastic processes Calling for Critical Thinking on Science, Darwinist Cites David Berlinski Sarah Chaffee March 29, 2018 Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science Education 5 Equipping people to be “their own science referees” is a large part of the mission of the intelligent design movement. Read More ›
