Tag: rhetoric | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

Burning woods with firesparks, flame and smoke. Strange weird odd elemental fiery figures on black background. Coal and ash. Abstract shapes at night. Bonfire outdoor on nature. Strenght of element.

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
March 19, 2014

Categories
Faith & Science
History of Science
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, bias, conflict myth, Cosmos (series), fact check, Giordano Bruno, heresy, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Neil deGrasse Tyson, persecution, revisionist history, rhetoric, Ronald L. Numbers, science and religion, theology}

Good for Them: National Center for Science Education Decries "Anti-Religious Bias," "Slipshod History of Science" in Cosmos

_{Casey Luskin
March 19, 2014

Faith & Science, History of Science, Science Reporting

7}

But other Darwin defenders seem to confirm Dembski's predicted "zero-concession policy," refusing to admit when their own camp makes a mistake. Read More ›

Wooden Defendant Dock in Historic Courtroom Interior

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
November 22, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Metaphysics
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, __k-review, C.S. Lewis, common descent, Darwin Mythology, Darwin on Trial, Darwinism as religion, dogmatism, evolution, evolutionism, fallibility, hubris, inference, inferential science, intellectual humility, metaphysical naturalism, nature, paradigm shift, persistent scientific errors, Phillip E. Johnson, rhetoric, Richard Dawkins, scientism, The Magician's Twin, undirected process, vestigial structures, Zeitgeist}

Darwin in the Dock: C.S. Lewis’s Critique of "Evolutionism"

_{John G. West
November 22, 2013

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Metaphysics, Scientific Trustworthiness

21}

By highlighting the all-too-human frailties of modern science, Lewis made his most important contribution to the evolution debate. Read More ›

Speech podiums in spotlight and covered in shadow. Political competition and debate concept

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 8, 2009

Categories
Cosmology
Ethics
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __nedited, Biola University, Charles Townes, Christopher Hitchens, cosmological argument, debate, evolutionary ethics, God, Kalam cosmological argument, logic, metaethics, moral argument, problem of evil, rhetoric, suffering, theism, William Lane Craig}

Logic vs. Emotion: Discovery Institute Fellow William Lane Craig Debates Christopher Hitchens on “Does God Exist?”

_{Casey Luskin
April 8, 2009

Cosmology, Ethics, Faith & Science

9}

The debate between Discovery Institute fellow William Lane Craig and "new atheist" Christopher Hitchens: "Does God Exist?" Read More ›

school boy decides examples math wrong on chalkboard background, education concept

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 22, 2006

Categories
History of Science
Legal Science (jurisprudence)
Science Education
Tagged
, __nedited, creation science, creationism, defining terms, Edwards v. Aguillard, exclusion, fact check, history of id, metanarrative, misinformation, peer-reviewed, propaganda, rhetoric, Ronald L. Numbers, strengths and weaknesses, The Design Inference}

What’s Up with Ronald Numbers? An Analysis of the Darwinist Metanarrative in the Journal of Clinical Investigation (Part I)

_{Casey Luskin
June 22, 2006

History of Science, Legal Science (jurisprudence), Science Education

9}

[Editor’s Note: The three individual installments of this series can be seen here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. The final complete article, What’s Up with Ronald Numbers? An Analysis of the Darwinist Metanarrative in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, can be found here.] Ronald Numbers is a widely respected historian of science. He is an exceptional scholar who has garnered the respect of people on all sides of this debate. However, a recent article in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, “Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action,” co-authored by, among others, Ronald L. Numbers, Elliot Sober [anti-ID philosopher], and Terese Berceau [anti-ID legislator], gives one pause to wonder if Numbers is shifting his role from commentator, Read More ›

Shattered chemistry flask. Chemistry concept. Scientific experiment

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
November 21, 2005

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy of Science
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, ad hoc hypotheses, Albert Einstein, Charles Krauthammer, common descent, Darwinism as religion, definist fallacy, demarcation criteria, epicycles, falsifiability, falsification, Kansas, Karl Popper, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Larry Laudan, positive case for design, rhetoric, Sigmund Freud, straw man, systematics, teleology, theology, theory, undirected evolution, Washington Post}

Don’t Bash it ‘Til You’ve Tried It: A response to Krauthammer and Kriegel

_{Casey Luskin
November 21, 2005

Intelligent Design, Philosophy of Science, Science Reporting

22}

Anti-ID editorials by Charles Krauthammer and Uriah Kriegel misunderstand science and offer poor critiques of intelligent design. Read More ›