Tag: Retraction Watch | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
August 24, 2019

Categories
Ethics
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, China, Communist Party, heart, human rights, kidney, liver, New Scientist, organs, Retraction Watch}

Fifteen Science Papers Retracted Over China Illegal Organ Harvesting

_{Wesley J. Smith
August 24, 2019

Ethics, Medicine

2}

Human-rights activists have castigated China for allowing this organ bazaar for years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
August 23, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __cedited, “consensus science”, Adam Marcus, Applied Mathematics Letters, carbon, earth, Elsevier, entropy, Granville Sewell, intelligent design, natural selection, open system, order, Physics Essays, pseudoscience, Retraction Watch, Second Law of Thermodynamics}

So, Who Is Doing “Pseudoscience”?

_{Granville Sewell
August 23, 2018

Evolution, Scientific Freedom

8}

You will be astonished by how corrupt science can become when reviewers are “very, very vigilant” to protect consensus science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 8, 2017

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __cedited, Ann Gauger, belief, bias, Brian Miller, DNA, intelligent design, Jack Szostak, materialism, monomers, Nature Chemistry, peptides, proteins, Retraction Crisis, Retraction Watch, RNA, Scientific American, Signature in the Cell, skepticism, Stephen Meyer}

Prominent Retraction Vindicates Stephen Meyer and Signature in the Cell

_{David Klinghoffer
December 8, 2017

Biology, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

4}

Criticism suggested that Nobel laureate Jack Szostak and others were fast closing in on a solution to the origin-of-life problem with the “principle of RNA self-replication." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
December 7, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __cedited, beliefs, bias, Harvard University, humans, Jack Szostak, Nature Chemistry, Nobel laureate, postdoc, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Retraction Crisis, Retraction Watch, RNA, scientists}

Retractions Show Scientists “Blinded” by Belief

_{Ann Gauger
December 7, 2017

Evolution

3}

Nobel laureate Jack Szostak has recently retracted a paper. This is a big deal because of who he is and because of where it was published. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
November 1, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Physical Sciences
Science
Tagged
, __nedited, Big Science, Bill Nye, Bret Weinstein, Darwinism, Evergreen State College, First Things, March for Science, Michael Ruse, naturalism, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Normal Science, post-truth, Retraction Watch, truth, Wesley J. Smith}

Can Science Survive Long in a Post-Modern World?

_{Denyse O’Leary
November 1, 2017

Evolution, Physical Sciences, Science

9}

It’s not clear. Metaphysical naturalism insists that there is no design in nature and that nature is all there is. Read More ›