Tag: Retraction Crisis

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
March 21, 2025

Categories
Bioethics
Psychology
Sociology
Tagged
, anxiety, Augustine Brannigan, college students, crying, emotional depression, experimental design, Office of Naval Research, penologists, persistent scientific errors, Philip G. Zimbardo, prison breaks, prisoner abuse, prisoners, psychologists, public policy, rage, Retraction Crisis, Retraction Watch, San Quentin State Prison, self-correcting, social psychology, Stanford Prison Experiment, Stanford University, study design, Thibault Le Texier, University of Calgary}

Retract the Stanford Prison Experiment?

_{Denyse O’Leary
March 21, 2025

Bioethics, Psychology, Sociology

7}

Beware of wildly popular sociology that tells us that our public policy preferences are somehow embedded in human nature. Life was never as simple as that. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 27, 2025

Categories
Bioethics
Medicine
Metascience
Tagged
, artificial intelligence, California, chatbots, China, Elisabeth Bik, errors, Ethiopia, India, investigation, large language models, misconduct, mistakes, Nature (journal), Pakistan, physicians, Research, research integrity, research misconduct, researchers, Retraction Crisis, Saudi Arabia, universities}

China Leads the World in Retracted Science Papers

_{Science and Culture
February 27, 2025

Bioethics, Medicine, Metascience

4}

Seven of the Top Ten retraction hotspots are in China but India, Ethiopia, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia also make an appearance. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
January 18, 2024

Categories
Bioethics
Metascience
Paleontology
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, abortions, Campbell's Law, conflict of interest, data integrity, Discovery Institute, disinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), evolutionary biologists, fertility, Frontiers in Psychology, Goodhart's Law, Harvard University, Laszlo Bencze, mental health, Mind Matters, peer review, perverse incentives, pregnancy, pro-life, Retraction Crisis, Robert J. Marks II, Walter Bradley Center}

Peer Review May Be Beyond Reform

_{Denyse O’Leary
January 18, 2024

Bioethics, Metascience, Paleontology, Scientific Trustworthiness

5}

Harvard is going to have quite a job convincing the world that it is still serious about reality-based thinking, never mind peer review. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
August 23, 2023

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, blood-clotting cascade, Center for Science and Culture, circulatory system, coagulation, Darwin's Black Box, enzymes, evolution, fibrinogen, intelligent design, irreducibly complex systems, Michael Behe, platelets, prothrombin, Retraction Crisis, Russell F. Doolittle, thrombin, thrombosis, unguided processes}

The Incredible Design of Vertebrate Blood Clotting

_{Jonathan McLatchie
August 23, 2023

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

13}

Recently, a commenter on the Center for Science and Culture’s Facebook page asked about a paper by the late biochemist Russell F. Doolittle. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
November 3, 2022

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science
Tagged
, Assembly Theory, bacteria, Cambridge University Press, design detection, Elisabeth Bik, fraud, intelligence, intelligent causation, intelligent design, Lee Cronin, New York Times, pattern, probability, Retraction Crisis, Sara Walker, specification, Twitter, William A. Dembski}

Design Detection in the New York Times — The Issue of Science Fraud

_{Paul Nelson
November 3, 2022

Intelligent Design, Science

3}

When the pincer closes around a pattern, intelligent causation is uniquely implicated. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 7, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, BioLogos, Brian Keating, Brian Miller, Casey Luskin, Christianity, Darrel Falk, Denis Lamoureux, developmental gene regulatory networks, evolution, evolutionary creation, intelligent design, Jim Stump, Lawrence Krauss, Michael Shermer, neo-Darwinian theory, Retraction Crisis, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution, Theistic Evolution (book)}

Concluding Thoughts on “Gracious Dialogue” with BioLogos

_{David Klinghoffer
June 7, 2021

Faith & Science

3}

What a peculiar thing to do. You invite someone for a “dialogue” and then, only once he’s left the building, do you start debating with him. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 2, 2021

Categories
Cosmology
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, atheism, BioLogos, Brian Miller, Casey Luskin, creationism, Darrel Falk, Michael Shermer, podcast, Retraction Crisis, Return of the God Hypothesis, Sam Harris, scientific investigation, Stephen Meyer, theism}

“This Is Not Your Father’s Creationism”: Atheist Michael Shermer Meets Stephen Meyer

_{David Klinghoffer
June 2, 2021

Cosmology, Physical Sciences

3}

Every cosmology either has theistic implications, or ends up wrecking the basis for rational scientific investigation of nature. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
May 28, 2021

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Cambridge University, chemists, Darrel Falk, Darwinian evolution, directed evolution, early Earth, Gerald F. Joyce, prebiotic conditions, Retraction Crisis, Return of the God Hypothesis, ribozymes, RNA self-replication, RNA world, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, Times Literary Supplement}

Darrel Falk Badly Mischaracterizes RNA World Experiments. . .and Stephen Meyer

_{Brian Miller
May 28, 2021

Biology, Intelligent Design

17}

Falk claims that Meyer misled his readers by not mentioning an allegedly significant newer result. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 28, 2021

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Physics
Tagged
, bestsellers, BioLogos, Brian Josephson, Brian Miller, Casey Luskin, Christianity, Darrel Falk, Discovery Institute, intelligent design, Nobel Prize, Retraction Crisis, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer, USA Today}

Requesting a (Partial) Retraction from Darrel Falk and BioLogos

_{David Klinghoffer
May 28, 2021

Biology, Chemistry, Cosmology, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life, Physics

3}

Why an avowedly Christian group would have its guns out for the God hypothesis is an interesting question from a psychological perspective. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 17, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, Ann Gauger, apology, BioLogos, chimpanzees, Christianity Today, Darrel Falk, Darwin's Doubt, Deborah Haarsma, Dennis Venema, DNA, enzyme, Evangelical Christians, evolution, Evolution News, human origins, humans, intelligent design, mutations, nylonase, Retraction Crisis, S. Joshua Swamidass, science, Scripture, Seattle, Stephen Meyer, truth-seeking, vitellogenin}

BioLogos and the Search for Truth

_{David Klinghoffer
January 17, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

Exactly how have the viewpoints at BioLogos been amended? Like a summer’s day in Seattle, it’s a bit cloudy — at least on the most interesting points. Read More ›