Tag: Neo-Darwinism | Page 11 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
May 17, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, evolution, ID the Future, information, Ira Berkowitz, Jerusalem, Lee Spetner, MIT, Neo-Darwinism, Not by Chance, physicists, podcast, propaganda, The Evolution Revolution, Thomas Malthus}

Why Neo-Darwinism Is Less than a Theory

_{Science & Culture
May 17, 2020

Evolution

1}

Lee Spetner also argues that, contrary to Darwinist propaganda, the evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria demonstrates a loss of information rather than a gain. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 11, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __cedited, biological information, Center for Science and Culture, Discovery Institute, Heritage Foundation, March for Science, Neo-Darwinism, science, scientism, Stephen Meyer, United States}

Listen: Stephen Meyer on How Evolution Degrades Information

_{Science & Culture
April 11, 2020

Evolution

1}

Dr. Meyer spoke at a 2017 event, “March for Science or March for Scientism? Understanding the Real Threats to Science in America.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
April 9, 2020

Categories
Biology
Medicine
Tagged
, __cedited, __image, cancer, common descent, disease, DNA, evolutionary theory, medical school, mutations, nature, Neo-Darwinism, patients, physicians, Randolph Nesse, The Myth of Darwinian Medicine (series), Theodosius Dobzhansky, tissue, tumor, Zombie Science (book)}

Evolutionary Theory Might Explain…a Deadly Disease

_{Jonathan Wells
April 9, 2020

Biology, Medicine

5}

Psychiatrist Randolph Nesse, a leader in this movement for “Darwinian medicine,” would require “questions about evolution in medical licensing examinations.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Flannery

Date
March 4, 2020

Categories
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, Auguste Comte, biological systems, cryo-electron microscopy, Darwin on Trial, Darwin's Black Box, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, history of id, intelligent design, logical positivism, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Michael Polanyi, molecular biology, Neo-Darwinism, Pajaro Dunes, Phillip E. Johnson, scientific reductionism}

What Precipitated the Intelligent Design Movement?

_{Michael Flannery
March 4, 2020

Genetics, Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science

3}

Here are some thoughts prompted by a rather curious question posed to me in an email, namely, “What were the findings that most helped ID since the turn of the millennium?” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
February 26, 2020

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, bacterial flagellum, bacteriophages, building blocks, chimpanzees, Darwin Devolves, debate, DNA, drive shaft, evolution, gears, Human, intelligent design, James Tour, methodological naturalism, molecular biology, motor, Mount Everest, Mount Rushmore, Neo-Darwinism, planthopper, propeller, Rice University, Richard Buggs, stator, Texas A&M, Veritas Forum}

Behe and Swamidass Debate Evolution and Intelligent Design at Texas A&M

_{Jonathan Witt
February 26, 2020

Biology, Chemistry, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

11}

When Michael Behe’s slide show flashed to a close up of the gears, a murmur of astonishment rolled through the audience. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Date
February 25, 2020

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, American Museum of Natural History, Ann Gauger, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus afarensis, Bernard Wood, Big Bang, Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, Genetics and the Origin of Species (book), George Gaylord Simpson, George Washington University, Günter Bechly, Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo sapiens, human origins, Ian Tattersall, intelligent design, macroevolution, Neo-Darwinism, neutral evolution, On the Origin of Species, Phillip E. Johnson, punctuated equilibrium, randomness, Richard Buggs, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Wikipedia}

Neo-Darwinism and the Big Bang of Man’s Origin

_{Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
February 25, 2020

Human Origins and Anthropology

37}

Proponents of the ruling theory tell us that we are all undoubtedly intelligent enough to fully grasp their theory, as long as we concur with it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
December 29, 2019

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Australopithecines, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus anamensis, Charles Darwin, Darwinian gradualism, David Gelernter, Ethiopia, Galápagos Islands, Germany, Homo (genus), Lucy, Modern evolutionary synthesis, mount improbable, National Geographic, Natural History Museum, Neo-Darwinism, Niles Eldredge, paleontology, Richard Dawkins, Royal Society, Sabine Hossenfelder, stasis, Stephen Jay Gould, stickleback fish, Stuttgart, vertebrate}

#4 of Our Top Stories of 2019: Apeman Waves Goodbye to Darwinian Gradualism

_{Günter Bechly
December 29, 2019

Human Origins and Anthropology

23}

A few days ago a sensational new paleontological discovery made headlines around the globe. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
November 26, 2019

Categories
Genetics
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, atheism, BIO-Complexity, chimpanzees, Darwinism, Discovery Institute Press, DNA, entomologists, Francisco Ayala, HLA-DRB1, hominins, human origins, insects, Jay Richards, Neo-Darwinism, Ola Hössjer, Science and Human Origins, theism}

Human Origins: Not a Simple Question

_{Ann Gauger
November 26, 2019

Genetics, Human Origins and Anthropology

13}

Is this proof of Adam and Eve? Far from it. It merely shows they might be possible. This model is scientific and as such is falsifiable. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
November 4, 2019

Categories
Engineering
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, education, evolution, high school, Mars, math, NASA, Neo-Darwinism, Next Generation Science Standards, science, scientific inquiry, Smithsonian Institution, strengths and weaknesses, students, Wired Magazine}

How Should We Then Teach Evolution?

_{Sarah Chaffee
November 4, 2019

Engineering, Science Education, Scientific Freedom

4}

Students who learn the difficult but important skills of examining data are more likely to engage in learning that sets them up for future STEM success. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
September 23, 2019

Categories
Biology
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, David Klinghoffer, evolution, Francis Crick, intelligent design, J. Budziszewski, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Louisiana Science Education Act, Massachusetts, Neo-Darwinism, public education, Royal Society, teachers, Theodosius Dobzhansky, University of Texas}

When Biologists Speak to Biology Teachers, Cont.

_{Sarah Chaffee
September 23, 2019

Biology, Science Education, Scientific Freedom

4}

As University of Texas political philosopher J. Budziszewski points out, some scientists modify their message on evolution when speaking to the teachers. Read More ›