Tag: National Center for Science Education (NCSE) | Page 2

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 16, 2021

Categories
Cosmology
Geology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Charles Lyell, Darwinian evolution, Douglas Axe, Eugenie Scott, evolutionary biology, geologists, historical sciences, intelligent agency, intelligent design, Intelligent Design Uncensored, Jonathan Witt, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Planck time, specified complexity, specified information, Stephen Jay Gould, William A. Dembski}

Answering an Objection: “You Can’t Measure Intelligent Design”

_{Casey Luskin
July 16, 2021

Cosmology, Geology, Intelligent Design

10}

We test intelligent design in the same way that we test all historical scientific theories. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
June 22, 2021

Categories
Science Reporting
Tagged
, Connecticut, creationists, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, Eugenie Scott, Jonathan Wells, media, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), National Public Radio, Seattle, transgenderism, USA Today}

Unprecedented? The News Media Put Words in Someone’s Mouth!

_{Jonathan Wells
June 22, 2021

Science Reporting

3}

The editors' action was unethical. Given the stakes in the controversy over allowing biological males to take over women’s sports, it was also immoral. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
March 26, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, anti-evolution, anti-science, Arkansas, common ancestor, creationism, dialogue, Eugenie Scott, evolution, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), natural selection, organisms, Paul Nelson, rhetoric}

What’s Wrong with Calling Intelligent Design “Anti-Evolution”?

_{Casey Luskin
March 26, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

The term “anti-evolution” has been used for decades, over and over, by untold numbers of defenders of Darwin and critics of the theory of intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 5, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Human Origins and Anthropology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, apes, Casey Luskin, evolution, Evolution: Education and Outreach, Homo (genus), human origins, information, intelligence, intelligent design, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Neo-Darwinism, paleoanthropologists, religion, Stephen Meyer}

Misconceptions about Misconceptions: Examining a Citation of My Work

_{Casey Luskin
February 5, 2021

Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology, Intelligent Design

6}

The citation is to one of my earliest writings on the topic of human origins, an article I published in an old ID journal. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
December 18, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, American Museum of Natural History, bacterial flagellum, Brown University, Cambridge University Press, Darwinian processes, Darwinism, Debating Design, function, Irreducible Complexity, John McDonald, John Polkinghorne, Kenneth Miller, Michael Ruse, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Paul Davies, Richard Swinburne, Stuart Kauffman, type III secretion system, William A. Dembski}

Excerpt: An Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution

_{Michael Behe
December 18, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

Rather than showing how their theory could handle the obstacle, some Darwinists are hoping to get around irreducible complexity by verbal tap dancing. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 8, 2020

Categories
Biology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, Biological Information: New Perspectives, censorship, defining terms, Del Ratzsch, dependency graph, Elsevier, explanatory filter, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, macroevolution, Michael Behe, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), peer-reviewed, publishers, search engines, specified complexity, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections

_{Casey Luskin
October 8, 2020

Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

6}

The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 20, 2020

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, critical thinking, Discovery Institute, education, evolutionary theory, ID the Future, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Nature (journal), podcast, Robert Crowther, Sarah Chaffee, Science Education Policy, strengths and weaknesses, survey}

Censors Claim Teachers “Advocate Evolution” More Now Than in 2007 — Don’t Believe It

_{Science and Culture
July 20, 2020

Science Education

1}

How likely are biology teachers with doubts about Darwinism to participate in a survey by an organization instrumental in attacking Darwin-doubting teachers? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 9, 2020

Categories
Medicine
Tagged
, Ann Reid, antibiotic resistance, bacteria, Darwinism, doctors, drugs, Eugenie Scott, health, medicine, mutations, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Nature (journal), pandemic, parasites, pathogens, public education, The Edge of Evolution, viruses}

Darwinism Would Fare Poorly Against Pandemics

_{Casey Luskin
July 9, 2020

Medicine

5}

When combatting disease-causing pathogens, we don’t use the idea that Darwinian evolution is of unlimited creativity. Just the opposite! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 8, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, Ann Reid, creationism, Darwinian evolution, David Klinghoffer, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Evolution: Education and Outreach, Glenn Branch, intelligent design, methodology, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Nature (journal), Next Generation Science Standards, scientists, survey, teachers}

Survey Misclassifies Darwin-Doubting Teachers

_{Casey Luskin
July 8, 2020

Evolution

13}

This project cannot tell us how many students are taught evolution dogmatically and how many are studying it scientifically. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 6, 2020

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Ann Reid, climate change, creationism, Darwinian theory, Discovery Institute, education, Eugenie Scott, evolution, intelligent design, National Association of Biology Teachers, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Nature (journal), public education, Sarah Chaffee, strengths and weaknesses, U.S. National Academy of Sciences}

NCSE Underreports Teachers Who Support Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
July 6, 2020

Science Education

5}

The National Center for Science Education (NCSE) is a non-profit group that has one primary mission: to censor minority scientific viewpoints on hot-button issues like evolution. Read More ›