Tag: National Academy of Sciences | Page 3

Portrait of a cheerful young couple standing together

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
February 18, 2020

Categories
Biology
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science), conception, Darwinian theory, gender, global warming, human life, Jeffrey Epstein, National Academy of Sciences, Nature (journal), New York Times, Scientific American, scientific journals, scientists, sex, Wall Street Journal}

Is Sex Binary?

_{Michael Egnor
February 18, 2020

Biology, Medicine

3}

The denial by mainstream scientists that sex is binary is of the same cloth as the denial that human life starts at conception and the denial that intelligent design is evident in living things. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 1, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute Press, Douglas Axe, evolution, intelligent design, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, Paul Nelson, Richard Lenski, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, The Deniable Darwin, Thomas Nagel, Tom Wolfe, Yale University}

#1 of Our Top Stories of 2019: Informed by Discovery Authors, Yale’s David Gelernter Rejects Darwinism

_{David Klinghoffer
January 1, 2020

Evolution

5}

He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
November 6, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Philosophy
Tagged
, __edited, 1984 (novel), Charles Darwin, Darwin on Trial, Ernst Mayr, George Orwell, London, National Academy of Sciences, naturalism, On the Origin of Species, Phillip E. Johnson, Stephen Meyer, T.H. Huxley, Tacoma, theology}

Phillip Johnson and the Rebellion of the Evidence

_{Paul Nelson
November 6, 2019

Evolution, Philosophy

7}

When Phil started talking, his diminutive stature and drab appearance melted away, replaced by a series of powerful arguments sharpened with irony and deadly accurate humor. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
November 6, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, Cavendish Laboratory, Darwin on Trial, Darwinism, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, evolutionary theory, fruit flies, Harvard University, human origins, Louisiana, macroevolution, methodological naturalism, Michael Denton, Michael Ruse, moths, National Academy of Sciences, Natural History Museum, Phillip E. Johnson, Richard Dawkins, Southern Methodist University, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Meyer, Supreme Court, U.C. Berkeley, University of Chicago}

Your Witness, Mr. Johnson: A Retrospective Review of Darwin on Trial

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 6, 2019

Evolution

8}

In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 8, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, bacteria, Caltech, Darwin Devolves, devolution, E. coli, evolution, genes, Hollywood, hype, intelligent design, laymen, Long Term Evolution Experiment, Michael Behe, mutations, National Academy of Sciences, New York Times, Phillip E. Johnson, Science Uprising, scientists, X-Men}

New Science Uprising Episode: Evolution, Mutations, and “Fooling the Laymen”

_{David Klinghoffer
July 8, 2019

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution

4}

The idea that random genetic mutations lead to wondrous, creative innovations is so influential that it forms the premise of a movie franchise, X-Men, that has grossed $6 billion. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 8, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, bacteria, Caltech, Darwin Devolves, devolution, E. coli, evolution, genes, Hollywood, hype, intelligent design, laymen, Long Term Evolution Experiment, Michael Behe, mutations, National Academy of Sciences, New York Times, Phillip E. Johnson, Science Uprising, scientists, X-Men}

New Science Uprising Episode: Evolution, Mutations, and “Fooling the Laymen”

_{David Klinghoffer
July 8, 2019

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution

4}

The idea that random genetic mutations lead to wondrous, creative innovations is so influential that it forms the premise of a movie franchise, X-Men, that has grossed $6 billion. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
June 27, 2019

Categories
Bioethics
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, Brave New World, CRISPR, genetic engineering, government funding, human embryos, marijuana, National Academy of Sciences, Nature (journal), petri dish, Royal Society, scientists}

A Push for Licenses to Genetically Engineer Human Beings

_{Wesley J. Smith
June 27, 2019

Bioethics, Medicine

4}

We can’t trust “the scientists” to do the right thing because over the years too many have proven unworthy. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
June 20, 2019

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Medicine
Tagged
, __cedited, abortion, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Medical Association, cancer, debate, egg, embryo, evolution, fertilization, fetus, gravity, human life, ideology, law, Leonardo da Vinci, National Academy of Sciences, parasite, public policy, science, scientists, sperm}

What the Abortion Debate Tells Us About Integrity in Science

_{Michael Egnor
June 20, 2019

Bioethics, Ethics, Medicine

4}

Science has quite a bit to contribute to our debate about abortion as a matter public policy. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 29, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __cedited, __image, Darwin Devolves, Eric Metaxas, events, evolution, genes, intelligent design, McCaw Hall, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, polar bears, Richard Lenski, Seattle, Socrates in the City, Stephen Colbert}

Michael Behe Defeats Critics; Join Us on July 10 in Seattle to Celebrate!

_{David Klinghoffer
May 29, 2019

Evolution

2}

His new book undercuts current evolutionary theory at its very basis — the idea that unguided biological processes can do anything genuinely creative. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 10, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __cedited, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Dennis Prager, Douglas Axe, evolution, intelligent design, Judaism, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, Paul Nelson, Richard Lenski, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, The Deniable Darwin, Thomas Nagel, Tom Wolfe, Yale University}

Yale’s David Gelernter: Darwin’s Doubt Is “One of the Most Important Books in a Generation”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 10, 2019

Evolution

5}

He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science. Read More ›