Tag: Nathan Lents | Page 8 | Science and Culture Today

The crumbling foundation of the house. Exposed house foundation with soil erosion.

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
December 31, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, "survival of the fittest", ALX1, bacteria, cichlid fishes, citrate, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Finches, Darwinian evolution, devolution, evolution, fiber optic cables, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, genes, Human Errors, intelligent design, Lake Victoria, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, natural selection, oxygen, Peaceful Science, Richard Lenski}

#2 of Our Top Stories of 2018: Behe’s Darwin Devolves Topples Foundational Claim of Evolution

_{Brian Miller
December 31, 2018

Evolution

8}

The evidence commonly cited to argue for evolution’s ability to drive large-scale transformations is almost always circular. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
November 21, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, "survival of the fittest", ALX1, bacteria, cichlid fishes, citrate, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Finches, Darwinian evolution, devolution, evolution, fiber optic cables, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, genes, Human Errors, intelligent design, Lake Victoria, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, natural selection, oxygen, Peaceful Science, Richard Lenski}

Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves Topples Foundational Claim of Evolutionary Theory

_{Brian Miller
November 21, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

I saw that biologist Nathan Lents says that he has been asked to review Mike Behe’s new book. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
November 13, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Linguistics
Reproductive Science
Tagged
, __k-review, birth, cell biology, disease, DNA, empathy, Euripides, gene, great apes, human body, infants, labor, medicine, molecular biology, mothers, mutations, Nathan Lents, nurse, pelvis, theory of mind, vitamin B12, vitamin C}

Biologist Nathan Lents: Beauty in Error

_{Ann Gauger
November 13, 2018

Evolution, Linguistics, Reproductive Science

4}

He has a different take on imperfection, one more optimistic than one might expect from someone who writes about what’s wrong with us. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 21, 2018

Categories
Anatomy
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", evolution, Evolution News, Human Errors, intelligent design, maxillary sinus, Nathan Lents, neuroscience, S. Joshua Swamidass, terminology, Wall Street Journal}

Critic of Intelligent Design Acknowledges: “Bad Design” Arguments Don’t Work

_{David Klinghoffer
September 21, 2018

Anatomy, Biology, Intelligent Design

4}

It’s good to be able to report progress. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
September 13, 2018

Categories
Anatomy
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", antibodies, bacteria, cilia, common cold, enzymes, Evolution News, gravity, Human Errors, intelligent design, maxillary sinus, Michael Egnor, mucus, Nathan Lents, Peaceful Science, physiology, S. Joshua Swamidass, Wall Street Journal, Wikipedia}

Nathan Lents Is Back; Still Wrong About Sinuses

_{Casey Luskin
September 13, 2018

Anatomy, Intelligent Design, Medicine

18}

The interaction with Lents is of interest because it provides an opportunity to look again, in some detail, at a fascinating illustration of design in action. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 9, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, alt-right, Charles Darwin, critics, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, documentary, Human Zoos, intelligent design, Nathan Lents, Racism, terminology, white supremacy}

Once Again, About the Word “Darwinism”

_{David Klinghoffer
September 9, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

A evolutionist complains, “They try to use ‘Darwinist’ like an albatross linking evolution to Darwin’s Victorian white supremacy.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 12, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", arXiv, evolution, human eye, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, light, Nathan Lents, observer, photon, quantum mechanics, Research, Richard Dawkins, vision, Zombie Science (book), zombies}

Human Eye, that “Clunky Design,” to be Used to Confirm, or Disconfirm, Quantum Mechanics

_{David Klinghoffer
July 12, 2018

Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences

4}

It can detect a single photon. It can test the foundations of our understanding of nature. And it is also a piece of “botched” work by evolution? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
June 26, 2018

Categories
Anatomy
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Australia, gestation, horse, Jonathan Wells, jumping, koala, Live Science, marsupials, Nathan Lents, opossum, ostrich, placental mammals, pouch, running, swimming, wombat}

Just Try Evolving That!

_{Ann Gauger
June 26, 2018

Anatomy, Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

I’d like to point out a few things to Dr. Alice Roberts. None of this is evolutionarily possible. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Steve Laufmann

Date
June 18, 2018

Categories
Anatomy
Biology
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, "God of the gaps", "poor design", bones, cartilage, constraints, Darwinists, Douglas Axe, evolution, global warming, Günter Bechly, human body, Human Errors, intelligent design, ligaments, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, Neo-Darwinism, physiology, Royal Society, Scott Minnich, tendons, Wall Street Journal, War and Peace, wrist}

The “Botched” Human Body, Revisited

_{Steve Laufmann
June 18, 2018

Anatomy, Biology, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences

11}

As a systems architect, I’ve spent decades designing and implementing large and complex systems of information systems. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
June 11, 2018

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", Case Western Reserve University, Charles Darwin, climate change, Darwinian evolution, David Klinghoffer, Gregor Mendel, Human Errors, Ian Tattersall, intelligent design, James Shapiro, Jonathan Wells, Michael Egnor, Nathan Lents, Paul Nelson, peer review, psychologist, Psychology Today, Skeptical Inquirer, stereotype}

Why Argue with Intelligent Design? Offer Drive-By Psychotherapy Instead!

_{Denyse O’Leary
June 11, 2018

Biology, Intelligent Design

7}

Avoiding serious discussion of design in nature (and of many other questions) fills a need. Read More ›