Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

mind-body problem

adrien-converse-kCrrUx7US04-unsplash
Photo credit: Adrien Converse via Unsplash.

Minding the Brain — An Introduction

In our modern age, full of science and technology, physical existence often appears to be the most substantial and “real” aspect of the world. Read More ›
Minding-the-Brain
Image source: Discovery Institute Press.

New Book: Mind Is More than the Brain

Says Gregory Chaitin, algorithmic information theory pioneer: "The mind-body problem lives! A stimulating collection of contemporary perspectives." Read More ›
consciousness
Photo credit: Dean Marston via Pixabay.

Brain Scientist: Consciousness Didn’t Evolve; It Creates Evolution

Donald Hoffman says that even the Big Bang must be understood in a universe where consciousness is fundamental. Read More ›
oak tree
matter
Photo: An oak tree, by Abrget47j (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

What Is Matter? The Aristotelian Perspective

Writing here yesterday, I pointed out the problems with materialist metaphysics. Read More ›
aristotle-greek-philosopher-polymath-of-classical-period-anc-738212613-stockpack-adobestock
Aristotle: greek philosopher, polymath of classical period, ancient greece's profound thinker and influential figure in fields spanning philosophy, science, ethics, politics
Image Credit: Alla - Adobe Stock

Teleology and the Mind

Perhaps the turning point in modern philosophy of science was the abandonment of teleology by Francis Bacon. Read More ›
brain
Image credit: GoodIdeas - Adobe Stock

Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Jeffrey Shallit

Materialist mathematician Jeffrey Shallit has a post on an article in the Globe and Mail about philosophy and the immateriality of the mind. Shallit’s post is titled “Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Philosophy”. Shallit doesn’t think much of philosophy: If philosophers think the view that “The brain is not an organ of consciousness. … The brain has no cognitive powers at all” deserves anything more than a good horselaugh, this simply shows how irrelevant philosophy has become … Our future understanding of cognition will come from neuroscience, not from Wittgenstein. Philosophy is plainly irrelevant to Shallit, which is the problem. Wittgenstein may not inform Dr. Shallit’s understanding of cognition, but Descartes, Kant, Hume, James, Skinner, Block, the Churchlands, Read More ›

© Discovery Institute