Michael Behe
Francis Galton’s Novel: A Vision of Horrors to Come
A Modest Comeback for Lamarck, and a Reminder of the Edge of Evolution
Josh Rosenau’s “Potemkin” Arguments
The Uncivil Style of Intelligent Design Critics
California Science Center (You Remember Them) Gets Space Shuttle Endeavor
Corticosteroid Receptors in Vertebrates: Luck or Design?
Behe’s Critics’ Scaffolding Falls Down
Michael Behe’s Critics Misunderstand Irreducible Complexity and Make Darwinian Evolution Unfalsifiable
Behe’s Critics Use Faulty Logic to Allege Creationist Connections to the Origin of Irreducible Complexity
Quarterly Review of Biology (QRB) published an error-filled article attacking Michael Behe and intelligent design (ID) as penance for publishing Behe’s article. So much for the claim from critics that Behe’s QRB paper had nothing to do with ID. In any case, the critical article by Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke, and Johan Braeckman uses fallacious logic to attempt to connect Michael Behe’s arguments from irreducible complexity to young earth creationism. There argument seems to be that if anyone anywhere who is a creationist has ever talked about an idea that sounds like irreducible complexity, then that was necessarily one of Behe’s sources for his ideas. Behe’s critics thus quote Henry Morris and other creationists talking about how some biological features Read More ›






































