Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

junk DNA

Samango_monkey_(Cercopithecus_mitis_erythrarchus)_Mount_Sheba
Photo: Samango monkey, by Charles J. Sharp, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

How “Junk” DNA Got Its Function: Evolutionary Tales Fail to Convince

Earlier this year there was a flurry of stories about how “junk DNA” may explain why humans don’t have tails. Read More ›
3D_DNA_High_contrast
Image credit: Tim Tim (VD fr), CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

Defending Our Literature Survey on Function for Junk DNA

Our list only scratches the surface of the literature, and you can’t negate the existence of that body of literature through a few complaints. Read More ›
national-cancer-institute-L7en7Lb-Ovc-unsplash
Photo: Cancer cells, by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash.

Disease-Associated “Junk” DNA Is Evidence of Function

When you mess with the “junk,” the result is problems. That doesn’t sound like junk DNA to me. Read More ›
Dan Stern Cardinale
Photo: Dan Stern Cardinale, via YouTube (screenshot).

Dr. Dan Has a Taste for Debate

From what I’ve been told, there are many examples of “non-conserved” regions having sequence-independent functions. Read More ›
Long-Story-Short-Screenshot-DNA-Repair
Image source: Discovery Institute.

DNA Repair and the Origin of Life: Here’s the Problem

Perhaps out there, watching along with you, is another Professor Dan Stern Cardinale who is imagining how easy it’s going to be to take this one apart. Read More ›
DNA
Photo credit: MIKI Yoshihito from Sapporo City,Hokkaido., JAPAN, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

Casey Luskin Reflects on His Recent Junk DNA Debate

For decades we were told that non-coding regions of our DNA are littered with evolutionary junk. Read More ›
DNA
Photo credit: Sangharsh Lohakare via Unsplash.

How the Myth of Junk DNA Hindered Science

For decades, we’ve been told that only a tiny percentage of DNA is functional and that the vast majority is useless junk. Read More ›
DNA
Photo credit: THAVIS 3D via Unsplash.

Did Dr. Dan Make Us Change Our Position on Junk DNA?

This claim is totally false and it perhaps reflects Dr. Dan’s wish to find a positive spin on the substance of what happened during the debate. Read More ›
DNA
Image credit: DIGITALE, via Unsplash.

Reflections on Casey Luskin’s Debate with “Dr. Dan”

I commend Dr. Dan for being an amicable dialogue partner and for his good faith attempt to engage substantively with the relevant scientific issues. Read More ›
DNA
Photo credit: Sangharsh Lohakare via Unsplash.

From the “Junk DNA” Files: Can “Degraded” LINE Elements Still Be Functional?

On May 2, Casey Luskin had an online debate with Professor Daniel Stern Cardinale, an evolutionary biologist at Rutgers University. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute