Science and Culture Today | Discovering Design in Nature

^{Type
post

Date
February 10, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Andrew McDiarmid, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, biologic institute, Douglas Axe, ID the Future, intelligent design, mutations, natural selection, podcast, Research}

Listen: Gauger on the Limits of Evolutionary Optimization

_{Science and Culture
February 10, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Biologist Ann Gauger explains how she and Douglas Axe tested popular hypotheses for protein origins. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 9, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Abraham Lincoln, Darwin Devolves, Gettysburg Address, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, Paul Nelson, Peaceful Science, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal)}

Darwin Devolves Reviewer: “Important Points” Omitted “In the Interest of Space”

_{David Klinghoffer
February 9, 2019

Evolution

2}

You don’t have to be Abraham Lincoln, who was satisfied with the 272 words of the Gettysburg Address. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 8, 2019

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, Bruce Gordon, Douglas Axe, education, intelligent design, Jay Richards, John West, Michael Behe, Pacific Northwest, Paul Nelson, professionals, professors, Richard Sternberg, Robert J. Marks II, Scott Minnich, Seattle, Stephen Meyer, Summer Seminars}

2019 Summer Seminars in Seattle: Study with Michael Behe and Other ID Superstars

_{David Klinghoffer
February 8, 2019

Science Education

3}

Other teachers are drawn from the ranks of those 1000+ Darwin-doubting scientists who have publicly identified themselves. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
February 8, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, bats, birds, body plans, circular reasoning, Darwin Devolves, dolphins, echolocation, evolution, exaptation, feathers, fish, flippers, Hox genes, Irreducible Complexity, mammals, Michael Behe, mutations, Science (journal)}

First Review of Darwin Devolves Relies Heavily on Circular Reasoning

_{Brian Miller
February 8, 2019

Evolution

3}

This line of argumentation only appears compelling to those who assume from that start that the core assumptions of the standard evolutionary model are true. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
February 8, 2019

Categories
Biology
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __k-review, Adam and Eve, atheism, Bible, Christianity, evolution, faith, intelligent design, monogenism, origins science, Peaceful Science, Reasonable Faith, Reasons to Believe, S. Joshua Swamidass, science, theistic evolution, theology, Washington University, William Lane Craig, Young Earth Creationists}

Meetings on Adam and Eve: Stretching the Boundaries

_{Ann Gauger
February 8, 2019

Biology, Human Origins and Anthropology

4}

What brought us all together? Professor S. Joshua Swamidass of Washington University has two projects going. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 7, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", anxiety, Darwin Devolves, devolution, dreams, evolution, firing squad, human body, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, National Academy of Sciences, panic, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), science journals}

Early Science Review of Darwin Devolves — A Panic Attack?

_{David Klinghoffer
February 7, 2019

Evolution

3}

Today in Seattle people were panicking about a big oncoming snowstorm, promised for tomorrow afternoon. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 7, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, devolution, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, genes, intelligent design, John Jay College, Long Term Evolution Experiment, Nathan Lents, National Academy of Sciences, offspring, Peaceful Science, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Woo-hoo! In Science Review of Darwin Devolves, Lenski Has No Response to My Main Argument

_{Michael Behe
February 7, 2019

Biology, Evolution

3}

In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 7, 2019

Categories
Faith & Science
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, Andrew McDiarmid, Galileo Galilei, heliocentrism, history, ID the Future, irrational, Michael Keas, myths, podcast, Roman Catholic, science, scientists, solar system, theologians, torture, Unbelievable}

Listen: Did Galileo Prove the Catholic Church’s Irrational Opposition to Science?

_{Science and Culture
February 7, 2019

Faith & Science, Physical Sciences

1}

There’s plenty here for both scientists and theologians to learn — as well as anyone who thinks Galileo shows the Church was at war against science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 6, 2019

Categories
Anatomy
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, antenna, brain, cilia, ciliopathies, cough, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, eyes, feet, fever, health, human body, Immune System, infection, intelligent design, lungs, Michael Behe, mucus, Nature (journal), pharynx, physiology, PNAS, running, saccades, T cells, University of Geneva, vision, walking}

Appreciate Your (Un-Evolved) Body

_{Science and Culture
February 6, 2019

Anatomy, Intelligent Design

10}

Things you probably didn’t even know about should arouse awe as we go about our tasks each day, and sleep each night. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 5, 2019

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, Christians, Darwin Devolves, history, ID critics, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Michael Behe, Michael Keas, Nathan Lents, science, students, Unbelievable, universities}

Flat Earth Myth: A Favorite with ID Critics

_{David Klinghoffer
February 5, 2019

Biology, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences

2}

Professor Jerry Coyne, for one, says that HarperCollins, publisher of Michael Behe’s forthcoming book, “should be ashamed at [sic] itself for publishing the biology equivalent of flat-Earthism.” Read More ›