Is AIVA’s “Genesis” Genius?

_{Sarah Chaffee
January 10, 2018

Intelligent Design

4}

Something that makes compositions great is the fact that abstract musical notation can somehow express a personality with its idiosyncrasies. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
January 10, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, circulation, Darwinian theory, evolution, excretion, intelligent design, Jurgen Otto, muscles, Nature Communications, nerves, science, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, youtube}

A Tiny but Mighty (and Dancing) Example of Design: The Rainbow-Colored Peacock Spider

_{Science and Culture
January 10, 2018

Intelligent Design

8}

The peacock spider was relatively unknown till Jurgen Otto began photographing them and posting videos of their elaborate, colorful dances. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
January 9, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, active information, biomolecules, Carl Zimmer, Douglas Axe, evolution, Evolutionary Informatics Lab, intelligent agents, intelligent design, natural selection, protein evolution, protein fold, search, University of Washington}

On Protein Design, Don’t Be Fooled by Biochemist David Baker’s Claim

_{Science and Culture
January 9, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

If designing proteins is difficult for us, it is great big wall for random bumbly evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
January 9, 2018

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, 'Oumuamua, asteroid, design filter, Dyson Sphere, intelligent design, Kepler mission, Michael Egnor, NASA, Penn State, SETI, Tabby's Star}

Studying Tabby’s Star, Scientists Use the Design Filter — Non-Intelligent Causes Win This Round

_{Science and Culture
January 9, 2018

Physical Sciences

6}

Here’s a case where astronomers ruled out intelligent causes, despite their initial excited hopes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 8, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, artificial intelligence, Baylor University, computers, consciousness, ID the Future, intelligent design, Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics, Robert Crowther, Robert J. Marks II, SpaceX, Tesla, understanding, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Elon Musk — Intelligent Design Proponent?

_{David Klinghoffer
January 8, 2018

Intelligent Design

1}

Admittedly, that may come as a surprise to Elon Musk, but I think Robert Marks defends the argument with a certain persuasive mischievousness. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
January 8, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, algae, biofilm, Biomimetics, echolocation, flagellum, Florida Atlantic University, Georgia Tech, intelligent design, Living Waters, National Geographic, Nature Communications, Science Advances, Thomas Nagel}

Bats, Algae, Beetles, Turtles: Cool Design Tricks from Nature

_{Science and Culture
January 8, 2018

Intelligent Design

7}

Almost every phylum of life provides inspiration for engineers and inventors. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 7, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin's House of Cards, Darwinian theory, debate, Discovery Institute Press, materialism, origins, policies, skepticism, thought, Tom Bethell}

Why the Darwin Debate Seems So Intractable

_{David Klinghoffer
January 7, 2018

Evolution

3}

James Kalb offers a thoughtful review of Tom Bethell’s recent book, Darwin’s House of Cards. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
January 5, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, “consensus science”, academic freedom, Censor of the Year, censorship, evolution, Facebook, intelligent design, Jay Richards, scientists, self-censorship, social media, students, Summer Seminars}

Quiet Self-Censorship and the Academic “Consensus”

_{Sarah Chaffee
January 5, 2018

Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

2}

Here is a sneak preview: Very shortly we will be opening up nominations for Censor of the Year. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
January 5, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Mathematics
Tagged
, __k-review, Biological Information: New Perspectives, Cornell University, extinction, John C. Sanford, Mendelian genetics, mutations, natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, proof, Springer, University of Virginia}

Peer-Reviewed Science: A “Mathematical Proof of Darwinian Evolution” Is Falsified

_{Science and Culture
January 5, 2018

Evolution, Genetics, Mathematics

8}

Due to the tradition of professional scientific writing, major developments in scientific literature often arrive muffled in language so bland or technical as to be totally missed by a general reader. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
January 4, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Technology
Tagged
, __k-review, actuators, animal, Cambrian Explosion, Conservation of Information, intelligent design, muscles, natural selection, nerves, Precambrian, robotics, robots, scientists, Wired}

A Cambrian Explosion…of Robots?

_{Science and Culture
January 4, 2018

Intelligent Design, Technology

3}

According to Wired, a new epoch has begun, and it is driven by intelligent design. Read More ›