
Wall Street Journal


Submit Nominations for 2018 Censor of the Year Now!

#6 of Our Top Stories of 2017: Dan Brown Pushes Atheism and Intelligent Design. Wait…What?

In This Season of Generosity, My Appeal to You

Dan Brown’s New Novel Pushes Atheism and Endorses Intelligent Design. Wait…What?

Scott Turner’s Darwin-Skeptical Purpose and Desire Wins Praise from the New York Times

Euthanasia Apologists Conceal the Truth About What They Advocate

Scientist: Debate on Controversial Science Is “Un-American”

Darwin Under the Microscope
Response to Barbara Forrest’s Kitzmiller Account Part VIII: Important Facts Left Out About ID Research
[Editor’s Note: A single article combining all ten installments of this response to Barbara Forrest can be found here, at “Response to Barbara Forrest’s Kitzmiller Account.” The individual installments may be seen here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10.] In her Kitzmiller account, Barbara Forrest leaves out information about the scientific research supporting ID, claiming “creationists are executing every phase except producing scientific data to support ID.” Ignoring her usage of the “creationist” label, Dr. Forrest’s argument mimics that of Judge Jones. Both Dr. Forrest and Judge Jones ignored the testimony provided in the courtroom during the Kitzmiller trial by Scott Minnich about his own experiments Read More ›






































