Tag: National Museum of Natural History | Page 3

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
August 7, 2018

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Faith & Science
Philosophy
Tagged
, __k-review, Christianity, creationism, Darwinian theory, Discovery Institute, education, evolution, finch beaks, Georgia, Glenn Branch, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), National Museum of Natural History, Next Generation Science Standards, public education, religion, Richard Dawkins, science, Scientific American, teachers, theology, vestigial structures}

Using Religion to Push Evolution in Public School Biology Class — What Could Go Wrong?

_{Sarah Chaffee
August 7, 2018

Biology, Evolution, Faith & Science, Philosophy

11}

A much better approach would be no religion in biology class, and more science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 20, 2018

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Brigham Young University, Casey Luskin, Evangelical Christians, evolution, Greg Cootsona, Harrisburg, human origins, intelligent design, John Templeton Foundation, National Museum of Natural History, Neanderthals, paleoanthropology, Philadelphia, Rick Potts, Smithsonian Institution}

Christians in the Evolutionary Crosshairs

_{David Klinghoffer
April 20, 2018

Faith & Science

6}

I’m not an Evangelical Christian, nor a Christian of any kind, so I have no personal stake in what Evangelicals believe about evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
March 5, 2018

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom, evolution, Free Science, intelligent design, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Martin Gaskell, National Museum of Natural History, New York Times, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Royal Society, Scott Minnich, Smithsonian Institution, Stephen Meyer, Third Way of Evolution, University of Idaho, University of Kentucky, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post}

New Website Advocates Free Science — An Idea Vital to the Progress of Knowledge

_{Sarah Chaffee
March 5, 2018

Scientific Freedom

5}

Let’s encourage dissent and embrace an authentically liberal approach to scientific inquiry. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 8, 2018

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom day, bullying, Censor of the Year, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, Darwin Day, fake news, Jerry Coyne, National Museum of Natural History, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Richard Sternberg, Sarah Chaffee, Smithsonian Institution, Wall Street Journal}

Submit Nominations for 2018 Censor of the Year Now!

_{David Klinghoffer
January 8, 2018

Scientific Freedom

4}

Darwinists do not go so far as to burn books. However, their actual tactics in suppressing open debate are far more effective. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 18, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, Brian Miller, Center for Science and Culture, Darwin's Corrosive Idea, Douglas Axe, Evolution News, fake news, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, John West, Jonathan Wells, Larry Sanger, Michael Egnor, National Museum of Natural History, Paul Nelson, Richard Sternberg, Smithsonian, Stephen Meyer, Wikipedia}

Here’s How You Can Fight Fake News on Darwinism in 2018

_{David Klinghoffer
December 18, 2017

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

4}

Darwinists have most universities and media plus vast government funding on their side. What we have is more potent, though. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 27, 2017

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, Censor of the Year, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, Darwinian theory, Donald Trump, Eric Hedin, football, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, lipids, National Museum of Natural History, Richard Sternberg, Smithsonian, Thomas Nagel, Victor Davis Hanson}

Freedom on the Football Field – How About in the Science Lab?

_{David Klinghoffer
September 27, 2017

Scientific Freedom

6}

The scientific “consensus” has immeasurably more power to coerce and silence, and on matters of far greater importance, than the President of the United States does. Read More ›