robot Type post Author Wesley J. Smith Date June 26, 2022 CategoriesBioethicsNeuroscience & Mind Tagged , adrenaline, algorithms, artificial intelligence, Blake Lemoine, computer science, DNA, emotions, engineers, feelings, free will, Google, human cells, imagination, Isaac Asimov, LaMDA, Language Model for Dialogue Applications, life, love, machines, materialists, René Descartes, self-awareness, sentience, software, soul, Stanford University, toaster, Washington Post, William Hurlbut Five Reasons Why AI Programs Are Not “Human” Wesley J. Smith June 26, 2022 Bioethics, Neuroscience & Mind 7 A Google engineer, Blake Lemoine, mistakenly designated one AI program "sentient." Read More ›
The Sun Type post Author Granville Sewell Date February 26, 2018 CategoriesMathematicsPhysical SciencesPhysics Tagged , __k-review, Applied Mathematics Letters, Biological Information: New Perspectives, carbon, common sense, computers, Cornell University, Darwinists, earth, entropy, iPhone, Isaac Asimov, libraries, Mathematical Intelligencer, Physics Essays, Richard Dawkins, Second Law of Thermodynamics, Smithsonian, steel, sun, tornadoes, unguided evolution The Second Law Argument: A Timeline Granville Sewell February 26, 2018 Mathematics, Physical Sciences, Physics 10 “Remove the sun,” wrote Isaac Asimov, “and the human brain would not have developed.” Read More ›
Type post Author Casey Luskin Date June 9, 2011 CategoriesEvolutionMathematicsScientific Freedom Tagged , __k-review, Applied Mathematics Letters, biosphere, Darwin lobby, Darwinian evolution, disorder, Energy, entropy, Granville Sewell, In the Beginning, Isaac Asimov, open system, Peter Urone, Second Law of Thermodynamics, Texas, University of Texas El Paso, William A. Dembski Digging Into Granville Sewell’s Peer-Reviewed Paper Challenging Darwinian Evolution Casey Luskin June 9, 2011 Evolution, Mathematics, Scientific Freedom 8 Dr. Sewell is fully aware of the standard objections to the classical version of the second law argument, but his thesis is not the classic unsophisticated version of the argument. Read More ›
