Tag: intelligent design | Page 115 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Coppedge

Date
July 25, 2022

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, Artificial Selection, Cnidaria, convergence, Current Biology, development, evolution, fallacy, Hydra, intelligence, intelligent design, jellyfish, natural selection, Nature Nanotechnology, Neural Networks, New Scientist, programmers, promissory note, purpose}

In Artificial and Biological Neural Networks, Intelligent Design Is Undeniable

_{David Coppedge
July 25, 2022

Biology, Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

10}

Someday evolutionists might connect the dots. Right now, even simple nerve nets in jellyfish and hydra are remarkably well designed for what they do. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
July 22, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Paleontology
Tagged
, Brazil, Charles Darwin, Crato Formation, Cretaceous, Darwinian evolution, evolution, Fossil Friday (series), fossils, insects, intelligent design, Lower Cretaceous, Natural History Museum, paleontologists, phylogenetics, Stuttgart, Willi Hennig}

Fossil Friday: Unknown Cicada from the Cretaceous

_{Günter Bechly
July 22, 2022

Evolution, Paleontology

4}

Only the infusion of new information from outside the system can explain these bursts of biological creativity. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 21, 2022

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, birds, brain, clams, genome, intelligence, intelligent design, invertebrates, jumping genes, junk DNA, Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements, mammals, marine invertebrates, octopuses, oysters, transposons, unguided evolution}

How Octopuses Got So Smart? “Junk DNA”

_{Science and Culture
July 21, 2022

Biology, Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

2}

Jumping genes used to be dismissed as junk DNA which in turn was held to be slam-dunk evidence for unguided evolutionary processes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 21, 2022

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, BioLogos, Brian Auten, Chad Gross, evolution, Francis Collins, geologists, ID 3.0, ID the Future, intelligent design, logic, Nobel laureates, peer-reviewed literature, podcast, Research, rhetoric, theistic evolution}

Luskin: Why Intelligent Design over Theistic Evolution?

_{Science and Culture
July 21, 2022

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

1}

Casey Luskin give a peek behind the scenes of ID 3.0, the current research program inspired by the intelligent design framework. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 20, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Physics
Tagged
, atheism, barbarism, crime, Darwinism, Darwinism as religion, evolution, fossil record, intelligent design, paleontology, Seattle, theism}

A Paleontologist Explains Intelligent Design to You

_{David Klinghoffer
July 20, 2022

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Physics

3}

Günter Bechly describes the species pair challenge, the waiting time problem, and much more that Darwinists can't explain. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Coppedge

Date
July 20, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, arthropods, brain, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, China, Current Biology, Ediacaran Period, evo-devo, evolution, fossil record, intelligent design, Kimberella, morphology, nervous system, newspapers, oxygen level, phyla, Stephen Meyer, USSR}

This Cambrian Explosion “Explanation” Qualifies as Propaganda

_{David Coppedge
July 20, 2022

Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

It’s interesting to see what Derek E. G. Briggs is willing to admit about the Cambrian explosion. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 20, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Brian Auten, Casey Luskin, Chad Gross, COVID-19, creationism, evidence, ID 3.0, ID the Future, intelligent design, pandemic, podcast, Research, revelation, South Africa}

Luskin: Intelligent Design’s Past, Present, and Future

_{Science and Culture
July 20, 2022

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Dr. Luskin also makes the case that ID is science. It’s based on physical evidence rather than religious revelation, and it makes testable predictions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 19, 2022

Categories
Cosmology
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Planetology
Tagged
, Abraham, atheism, Big Bang, Brian Keating, Dennis Prager Show, heavens, intelligent design, James Webb Space Telescope, NASA, Return of the God Hypothesis, stars, Stephen Meyer, UC San Diego}

Count the Stars: Webb Space Telescope and the God Hypothesis

_{David Klinghoffer
July 19, 2022

Cosmology, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences, Planetology

4}

I was listening to the Dennis Prager Show and found to my delight that his guest was our friend Brian Keating, the distinguished UC San Diego cosmologist. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
July 15, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Paleontology
Tagged
, Brazil, Cambrian Explosion, Crato Formation, crocodiles, Crurotarsi, Darwin critics, Darwinists, dinosaurs, evolution, Fossil Friday (series), holotype, ichthyosaur, intelligent design, lizards, Lower Cretaceous, Mammaliaformes, mammals, Nature Communications, Peter Ward, pterosaurs, turtles, Upper Triassic}

Fossil Friday: A Croc Smile from the Cretaceous

_{Günter Bechly
July 15, 2022

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Paleontology

4}

Ubiquitous discontinuities contradict the gradualist predictions of Darwin’s theory and thus should count as empirical falsifications of that theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 14, 2022

Categories
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, atheism, churches, COVID-19, cowardice, Discovery Institute, evolution, faith, Gallup poll, groupthink, intelligent design, Newsweek, Pew Research Center, Return of the God Hypothesis, scientists, Stephen Meyer, survey, universe, young people}

Stephen Meyer: How Misunderstood Science Drives Religious Disbelief

_{David Klinghoffer
July 14, 2022

Cosmology, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences

2}

What a shame that the scientific mainstream has done such a poor job of communicating its own discoveries to the public. Read More ›