Tag: evidence for id

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 7, 2025

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, argument in the alternative, attorneys, biology, Casey Luskin, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, Darwinian evolution, defining id, defining science, definist fallacy, demarcation criteria, evidence, evidence for id, evolution, geologists, historical sciences, ID research program, intelligent design, lawyers, natural world, non-science, peer-reviewed literature, predictive-success, Research, science, scientific method, testability}

The Divide Between Science and Non-Science

_{David Klinghoffer
July 7, 2025

Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

2}

The most commonly heard charge against ID is that it “isn’t science” and therefore can’t even be evaluated as a scientific alternative to Darwinian evolution. Read More ›

Microscopic view of cell membrane structure, illustrating semi-permeable lipid bilayer with embedded proteins, regulating molecular transport and maintaining cellular integrity. — lipid bilayer

^{Type
post

Date
January 6, 2017

Categories
Biochemistry
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, __nedited, "God of the gaps", code, curiosity, evidence for id, gene duplication, Israel, john lennox, lipid bilayer, lipids, Parkinson’s disease, Research, rigor, software analogy}

Interview: Biochemist Explains Why Lipids Are “Designed Objects”

_{Science and Culture
January 6, 2017

Biochemistry, Intelligent Design, Medicine

11}

The scientist, a researcher at one of Israel's institutes of higher education, asked that his identity be kept in confidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
October 27, 2016

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, absence of evidence, argument from ignorance, circular reasoning, Darwinian theory, evidence for id, experimental science, falsifiability, gradualism, Irreducible Complexity, Jerry Coyne, Kenneth Miller, logic, Michael Ruse, molecular biology, positive case for design, presuppositions, Response to Criticism, testability, theistic evolution, Thomas Reid}

Philosophical Objections to Intelligent Design: A Response to Critics

_{Michael Behe
October 27, 2016

Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science

38}

Some reviewers of Darwin's Black Box raised philosophical objections. I will discuss several of these. Read More ›

Digital seamless mathematical formulas. Abstract digital futuristic background with math, physics symbols and mesh network grid. 3D illustration in 4K science concept

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 14, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, defining terms, demarcation criteria, evidence for id, experimental science, hypothesis, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, NAS, National Academy of Sciences, observations, positive case for design, scientific theory, specified information, theory}

How Do We Know Intelligent Design Is a Scientific “Theory”?

_{Casey Luskin
October 14, 2011

Intelligent Design, Philosophy of Science

7}

Let's take the definition of "theory" given by ID's most eminent scientific critics, and if ID meets that definition then there's a good bet ID may properly be considered a scientific theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 2, 2011

Categories
Science Reporting
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __nedited, ad hoc hypotheses, argument from analogy, Cambrian Explosion, common ancestry, common descent, DNA, evidence for id, Forbes, John Farrell, Medieval science, methodological naturalism, misrepresentation, natural philosophy, nested hierarchy, positive case for design, Response to Criticism, sequence hypothesis, straw man, Tree of Life}

Who Misrepresented Who? A Response to John Farrell

_{Casey Luskin
April 2, 2011

Science Reporting, Scientific Reasoning

15}

When we find re-usage of parts in a way that cannot be explained by a phylogenetic tree and common descent, this is the sort of data we might expect under intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jay W. Richards

Date
February 15, 2010

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, causation, Church Fathers, counterflow, definist fallacy, Del Ratzsch, design detection, evidence for id, exoplanets, explanatory filter, extra-terrestrial intelligence, eye, foresight, intervention, Irreducible Complexity, methodological pluralism, Michael Behe, miracles, natural laws, natural processes, positive case for design, Roman Catholicism, secondary causation, straw man, teleology, theism, theistic evolution, theology}

How to Completely Misunderstand Intelligent Design: A Response to Stephen Barr

_{Jay W. Richards
February 15, 2010

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

14}

Catholic physicist Stephen Barr is a constitutionally uncharitable critic of ID. It's not clear that he has even read the books that he criticizes. Read More ›