Tag: BioEssays | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
June 2, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, "survival of the fittest", appendix, BioEssays, California Science Center, cells, censorship, chimpanzees, choking, Christians, Communist Party, conferences, Current Biology, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian theory, Dave Speijer, Dover trial, dysteleology, Heretic, intelligent design, J.B.S. Haldane, Judge John E. Jones, Kremlin, Matti Leisola, methodological naturalism, Michael Behe, Norway, Richard Dawkins, Richard Sternberg, social media, speech, Stephen Jay Gould, Uncommon Descent}

Darwin’s Desperation?

_{Science & Culture
June 2, 2020

Evolution

9}

Darwinists easily obtain a global microphone to rant against intelligent design, while ID advocates silently gain adherents. Is it a sign of desperation? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 28, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, BioEssays, biologists, bullies, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, cosmos, Darwinism, Darwinists, Dave Speijer, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Facebook, free speech, ideology, Inquisition, intelligent design, John Zmirak, nihilism, The Stream, Twitter, worldview}

“Nobody Expects the Darwinist Inquisition”? I Do

_{David Klinghoffer
May 28, 2020

Scientific Freedom

3}

It’s an ominous sight to observe the two waves approaching each other. On one side is an intensifying drive to police social media. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
May 28, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Big Bang, BioEssays, CDC, censorship, Centers for Disease Control, China, climate change, coronavirus, COVID-19, Darwinian evolution, incompetence, Jonathan Wells, masks, Panda's Thumb, pandemic, science denial, scientists, Steven Novella, Washington Post, World Health Organization, Yale University}

What Scientists Know

_{Michael Egnor
May 28, 2020

Intelligent Design, Medicine

5}

Our scientific elites insist that the “scientific consensus” be accepted without question. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 27, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, BioEssays, biologists, censorship, complex and specified information, CSI, Dave Speijer, Discovering Intelligent Design, Europeans, Evolution News, Federal Government, government, intelligence, intelligent design, Kevin Laland, Le Centre national de la recherche scientifique, males, Michael Behe, Neo-Darwinism, Royal Society, sex, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, The Design Revolution, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, William A. Dembski}

Scientist Admits Biologists Are Obsessed with Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
May 27, 2020

Intelligent Design

12}

What do scientists spend more time thinking about — sex, or the theory of intelligent design? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 19, 2020

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Philosophy
Physics
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Amazon, Big Bang, Big Tech, BioEssays, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, censorship, Charles Darwin, Christianity, computer engineering, Dave Speijer, Discovery Institute Press, Eric Anderson, Ernst Haeckel, Evolution News, Facebook, free speech, Google, homeschooling, intellignet design, Kindle, Marcos Eberlin, Paul Chien, Robert Alston, Robert Waltzer, students}

Here’s How to Fight Censorship — In a “Nutshell”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 19, 2020

Biology, Chemistry, Intelligent Design, Mathematics, Philosophy, Physics, Scientific Freedom

4}

The five authors, led by Thomas Y. Lo, cover the range of evidence for intelligent design in under 150 pages. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 18, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, "poor design", Andrew Moore, appendix, BioEssays, censorship, chance, coccyx, Darwinian evolution, Dave Speijer, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Facebook, free speech, intelligent design, Jacques Monod, junk DNA, Karl Popper, Panda's Thumb, Paul Nelson, Signature in the Cell, social media, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Meyer, The Design Inference, vertebrate eye}

What Triggered a Biology Journal to Demand Government Censorship of Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
May 18, 2020

Scientific Freedom

20}

The article is like a thermometer measuring a fever among evolutionists. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 14, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Andrew Moore, BioEssays, CDC, censorship, COVID-19, Dave Speijer, democracy, Dennis Prager, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Facebook, Federal Government, free speech, intelligent design, Iran, Italy, Karl Popper, Paul Nelson, schools, search engines, social media, South Korea, Thomas Paine, University of Amsterdam, vaccine, White House}

Prominent Biology Journal Demands Government Censorship of Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
May 14, 2020

Scientific Freedom

7}

A scientist calls for censorship while having the chutzpah to quote from Thomas Paine, a foremost spokesman for free speech in Western democracy. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 10, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, binding sites, BioEssays, DNA, ENCODE, evolution, genome, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, junk DNA, multicellular organisms, non-coding DNA, PNAS, The Myth of Junk DNA, transcription factors, transposable elements}

Jonathan Wells Was Right: Non-coding DNA Continues to Show Function

_{Science & Culture
December 10, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

Design predictions rise as evolutionary assumptions fall. The junk DNA myth is, for all practical purposes, falsified. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
November 18, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, adenine, Andrew Moore, BioEssays, Biological Information: New Perspectives, cytosine, DNA, ENCODE, evolution, Francis Crick, function, genome, guanine, intelligent design, junk DNA, Leslie Orgel, narrative gloss, overlapping codes, proteins, selective pressure, thymine}

BioEssays Editor: “‘Junk’ DNA… Full of Information!” Including Genome-Sized “Genomic Code”

_{Casey Luskin
November 18, 2019

Intelligent Design

13}

How many times have we heard it claimed that the vast majority of the human genome is “junk” and therefore could not have been designed? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
November 26, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, adaptive mutations, ants, bacteria, bacteriophages, BioEssays, Cell (journal), cetaceans, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, deletions, Eugene Koonin, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, geneticists, horizontal gene transfer, insertions, loss-of-function mutations, Michael Behe, mutations, polar bears, The Edge of Evolution, The Quarterly Review of Biology, viruses}

Bacteriophages, Budding Yeast, and Behe’s Vindication

_{Ann Gauger
November 26, 2018

Evolution

9}

It’s been known for some time that bacteria evade antibiotics by mutating the target of the antibiotic, often at a cost to themselves. Read More ›