Author: Michael Behe | Page 4 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 6, 2019

Categories
Evolution
History of Science
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, blubber, cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian mechanism, DNA, evolution, genes, mice, Michigan State University, polar bears, proteins, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, Science (journal), Telliamed Revisited, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Lessons from Polar Bear Studies

_{Michael Behe
March 6, 2019

Evolution, History of Science, Philosophy of Science

10}

Computer methods of analyzing mutations are widely used because they are generally accurate. They do not suddenly lose their accuracy when I cite them. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, blood-clotting cascade, Cambridge University Press, chloroquine, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, E. coli, Ernst Mayr, evolution, exaptation, Finding Darwin's God, gene duplication, hemoglobin, Hox genes, Kenneth Miller, Long Term Evolution Experiment, mammals, mutations, Nathan Lents, natural selection, neo-Darwinian evolution, olfaction, PLoS Genetics, primates, Response to Criticism, ribose, Richard Lenski, Robert L. Summers, Russell Doolittle, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), The Edge of Evolution, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Train Wreck of a Review: A Response to Lenski et al. in Science

_{Michael Behe
February 14, 2019

Evolution

30}

Richard Lenski has spent decades overseeing the most extensive, most acclaimed laboratory evolution experiment conducted to date. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 14, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, Cell (journal), Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, gene regulation, genes, humans, Jerry Coyne, Long Term Evolution Experiment, mice, Nathan Lents, polar bears, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Shiping Liu}

Coyne and Polar Bears: Why You Should Never Rely on Incompetent Reviewers

_{Michael Behe
February 14, 2019

Biology, Evolution

5}

A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 7, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, devolution, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, genes, intelligent design, John Jay College, Long Term Evolution Experiment, Nathan Lents, National Academy of Sciences, offspring, Peaceful Science, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Woo-hoo! In Science Review of Darwin Devolves, Lenski Has No Response to My Main Argument

_{Michael Behe
February 7, 2019

Biology, Evolution

3}

In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
January 28, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, animal kingdom, beauty, butterfly wings, cholesterol, Darwinian mechanism, David Snoke, law, literature, mind, music, mutations, natural selection, nutrition, sexual selection}

Here’s How to Tell if Scientists Are Exaggerating

_{Michael Behe
January 28, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Here’s the simple test to tell if scientists are exaggerating wildly. Let’s call it: “The Principle of Comparative Difficulty.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
January 23, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, biologists, C.S. Lewis, conservatives, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, David Klinghoffer, evolution, intelligent design, James A. Shapiro, Jerry Coyne, John Milton, Kevin Williamson, logic, National Review, poetry, T.S. Eliot}

On Intelligent Design, Do Your Own Homework. Make Up Your Own Mind.

_{Michael Behe
January 23, 2019

Evolution

5}

C.S. Lewis encountered an objection to his literary criticism analogous to Kevin Williamson’s and explored its underlying logic. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
December 18, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, events, science}

Best of Behe: Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design? An Address at the American Museum of Natural History

_{Michael Behe
December 18, 2016

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Let's begin with a sketch of the design argument. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
December 8, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, science}

Best of Behe: An Open Letter to Professors Kenneth Miller and PZ Myers

_{Michael Behe
December 8, 2016

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Everyone is looking forward to seeing your calculations. Please keep the rhetoric to a minimum. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
December 1, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Research, Revolutionary: Michael Behe and the Mystery of Molecular Machines (film), video}

Best of Behe: Waiting Longer for Two Mutations

_{Michael Behe
December 1, 2016

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Durrett and Schmidt illustrate "my" mistake with an example about a lottery winner. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
November 25, 2016

Categories
Biochemistry
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __nedited, complexity theory, Darwin skeptics, defining id, defining terms, design intuition, molecular machines, Mount Rushmore, Rocky Mountains, watchmaker, William Paley}

Best of Behe: Design for Living

_{Michael Behe
November 25, 2016

Biochemistry, Intelligent Design

5}

I have found widespread confusion about what intelligent design is and what it is not. Read More ›