Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Summer-Seminar-2017-5958-Richard-Sternberg-1536x1024-1
Image: Richard Sternberg, via Discovery Institute.
Latest

Progress Since the Sternberg Smithsonian Saga 20 Years Ago

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

In 2004, Smithsonian Institute scientist Dr. Richard Sternberg was cancelled for daring to publish a paper by Dr. Stephen Meyer supportive of intelligent design in a peer-reviewed journal. On a new episode of ID the Future, writer and teacher Daniel Witt joins us to reflect on the controversy. Witt explains the rhetorical strategies Darwinists have used to deride intelligent design. He also reports on an encouraging trend of scientists willing to stand up to the censors and bullies who get in the way of pursuing the evidence where it leads. 

For decades, opponents of intelligent design derided the theory as unscientific because it hadn’t been published in peer-reviewed science journals. “What intelligent design advocates fail to realize is that the peer-review process could benefit them enormously,” sneered one such opponent, computer scientist Jeffrey Shallit, in 2001. But when a peer-reviewed journal published an ID-friendly paper in 2004, the response from Darwinists was simply more derision. And for Dr. Richard Sternberg, it was worse. Sternberg endured sustained hostility from his colleagues at the Smithsonian, including conspiracy theories and wild accusations, that damaged his reputation and resulted in his premature departure. And he’s not the only one. Other scientists have suffered a similar fate. 

Instead of encouraging open dialogue about important scientific questions, the Darwin bullies have opted to prop up the Darwinian paradigm through brute force. But as Witt explains, gravity eventually wins out and the truth is revealed. Witt discusses some of the progress made in the debate in the last twenty years, noting that more and more scientists are willing to go against the grain: “People just aren’t willing to let the old guard of neo-Darwinism say you can’t question neo-Darwinism anymore.” One recent example of that bravery is Joana Xavier, a chemist at Imperial College London, who recently praised Dr. Meyer’s latest book Return of the God Hypothesis: “Let’s not put intelligent design on a spike and burn it,” she says. “Let’s understand what they’re saying and engage.” Find the podcast and listen to it here.

Dig Deeper

Click here to display content from YouTube.
Learn more in YouTube’s privacy policy.

Andrew McDiarmid

Director of Podcasting and Senior Fellow
Andrew McDiarmid is Director of Podcasting and a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute. He is also a contributing writer to Mind Matters. He produces ID The Future, a podcast from the Center for Science & Culture that presents the case, research, and implications of intelligent design and explores the debate over evolution. He writes and speaks regularly on the impact of technology on human living. Discovery Institute co-founder and bestselling author George Gilder has called McDiarmid “a scintillating venturer beyond the surfaces of technology to their hidden depths and meanings.” His work has appeared in numerous publications, including the Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Daily Wire, Real Clear Politics, Newsmax, The American Spectator, Technoskeptic Magazine, and elsewhere. In addition to his roles at Discovery Institute, he promotes his homeland as host of the Scottish culture and music podcast Simply Scottish. Andrew holds an MA in Teaching from Seattle Pacific University and a BA in English/Creative Writing from the University of Washington.
Benefiting from Science & Culture Today?
Support the Center for Science and Culture and ensure that we can continue to publish counter-cultural commentary and original reporting and analysis on scientific research, evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, and intelligent design.

© Discovery Institute