Type post Date April 11, 2019 CategoriesIntelligent DesignPhilosophy Tagged , __k-review, aesthetics, Albert Einstein, Daniel Dennett, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, Elliott Sober, evolution, intelligent design, Jerry Fodor, Karl Popper, materialists, methodological naturalism, Michael Behe, Michael Egnor, Nancy Pearcey, Nature (journal), Phillip E. Johnson, philosophers, PNAS, science, selection, Summer Seminars, theory of mind, Thomas Kuhn, Thomas Nagel, William Whewell Philosophers Want Back into Science Science & Culture April 11, 2019 Intelligent Design, Philosophy 8 One might call the 20th century a “philosopher of the gaps” period, with scientists basking in the headlines and philosophy finding less and less to do. Read More ›
Frances_H_Arnold_at_Caltech_2008 Type post Author Douglas Axe Date October 3, 2018 CategoriesChemistryIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, amino-acid sequences, Caltech, Cambridge, cells, Darwinian evolution, design, directed evolution, enzymes, evolution, Frances Arnold, genes, intelligent design, New York Times, Nobel Prize, protein evolution, selection, University of Missouri Nobel Prize in Chemistry for Intelligent Design? Douglas Axe October 3, 2018 Chemistry, Intelligent Design 3 The problem these efforts face in the lab is exactly the problem faced by Darwin’s evolutionary mechanism in the wild. Read More ›
Darwinism 3 Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date August 1, 2018 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, Albert Einstein, Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinism, Ethan Siegel, evolution, Forbes, general relativity, inheritance, intelligent design, Michael Flannery, Newtonian mechanics, predictions, Royal Society, Sarah Chaffee, selection, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, Third Way of Evolution For This Physicist, “Overthrowing” Darwinism Is on the Table David Klinghoffer August 1, 2018 Evolution, Intelligent Design 3 ID is a rival theory, a scientific theory, doing the normal work that scientific ideas must do to supplant a currently dominant idea. Read More ›
