Tag: philosophers | Page 13 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
February 16, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, events, ID the Future, intelligent design, mathematician, philosophers, registration, Robert Crowther, William A. Dembski}

William Dembski: Why I’m Returning to the Front Lines of Intelligent Design

_{Science & Culture
February 16, 2021

Intelligent Design

1}

The mathematician and philosopher also gives a sneak preview of the talk he plans to give at this Saturday’s Dallas Conference on Science and Faith. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
December 10, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biological systems, blood clotting, Boston Review, Case Western Reserve University, Cell (journal), Darwin's Black Box, Darwinists, Eugenie Scott, evolution, fibrinogen, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Jonathan Wells, Karl Giberson, mice, Michael Ruse, MIT, National Academy of Sciences, natural selection, pathology, philosophers, pregnancy, Robert Pennock, Russell Doolittle, The Scientist, UC San Diego, William A. Dembski}

Excerpt: A Reply to Michael Ruse

_{Michael Behe
December 10, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution

5}

Let me tell a little story about blood clotting, Russell Doolittle, and Michael Ruse. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 21, 2020

Categories
Evolutionary Psychology
Intelligent Design
Linguistics
Philosophy
Tagged
, Angus Menuge, demiurge, English, evolution, Hell, intelligence, Jonathan Wells, materialists, mechanism, Michael Behe, natural selection, Phillip E. Johnson, philosophers, Stephen Meyer, teleology, William A. Dembski}

On Intelligent Design, an Italian Philosophy Journal Takes a Step in the Right Direction

_{Casey Luskin
May 21, 2020

Evolutionary Psychology, Intelligent Design, Linguistics, Philosophy

9}

Earlier today we saw that philosopher Subrena E. Smith levied a harsh critique of evolutionary psychology. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Charles Thaxton

Date
April 6, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __k-review, Charles Thaxton, DNA, Francis Crick, intelligent design, James Watson, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Massachusetts, molecular biology, Mount Rushmore, murder, NASA, nucleic acids, philosophers, proteins, SETI, Sherlock Holmes, South Dakota, specified complexity, suicide, The Mystery of Life’s Origin}

“Nothing More Deceptive than an Obvious Fact”

_{Charles Thaxton
April 6, 2020

Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

13}

We are not saying DNA is like a message. Rather, DNA is a message. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 1, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, ancient Greece, atheism, Caltech, credentialism, Dallas Conference on Science & Faith, Discovery Institute, Douglas Axe, evolution, expertise, experts, frogs, high school, intelligent design, materialists, molecular biology, philosophers, Stephen Meyer, U.C. Berkeley}

Evolution and the “Experts” — A Liberating Message from Molecular Biologist Doug Axe

_{David Klinghoffer
April 1, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

The controversy about Darwinian evolution is often framed as a matter of credentials. We must listen to the “experts”! Please precious experts, tell us what to think! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 11, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Tagged
, __edited, accidents, Charles Darwin, culture, Discovery Institute, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe, philosophers, scientists, Secrets of the Cell, theology}

With a Hopeful Message About Life’s “X Factor,” Episode 5 of Secrets of the Cell Is Well Timed

_{David Klinghoffer
March 11, 2020

Intelligent Design, Philosophy

3}

Michael Behe is a biochemist, leading proponent of intelligent design, and a wise guide to understanding the wonders of life with its mysterious “purposeful arrangement of parts.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 19, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Alvin Plantinga, biologists, Boston Review, Charles Darwin, chloroquine, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian processes, Darwinists, designer, function, genes, H. Allen Orr, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John McDonald, lungs, Michael Behe, Mount Rushmore, mouse, mousetrap, philosophers, Purdue University, The Design Inference, The Edge of Evolution, Where the Conflict Really Lies, William A. Dembski}

Philosophical-ish Objections to Intelligent Design: A Response to Paul Draper

_{Michael Behe
February 19, 2020

Intelligent Design

22}

Recently I was asked by several people whether I had ever responded to an old review of my book Darwin’s Black Box. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 13, 2020

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, application, biological complexity, Bruce Gordon, Daniel Reeves, deadline, engineers, graduate students, Guillermo Gonzalez, intelligent design, Iron Curtain, John West, mathematician, Michael Behe, origin of life, Paul Nelson, philosophers, physicians, physicists, professors, Research, Soviet Union, Stephen Meyer, Summer Seminars, undergraduates, William A. Dembski}

“Safe to Question” — Another Graduate of Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design Shares Her Story

_{David Klinghoffer
February 13, 2020

Biology, Intelligent Design

5}

Discovery Institute is populating a community of dissenters in academia with the annual all-expenses-paid Summer Seminars. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
February 11, 2020

Categories
Mathematics
Physical Sciences
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __edited, Bernardo Kastrup, Big Bang, black holes, Cartesian dualism, consciousness, Darwinists, Jerry Coyne, love, materialism, mercy, philosophers, physical science, physicalism, res cogitans, supernatural, truth}

Do Physicalists Believe in Black Holes?

_{Michael Egnor
February 11, 2020

Mathematics, Physical Sciences, Scientific Reasoning

4}

A materialist view of reality leaves out much of reality (love, reason, mercy, truth, etc.) so skittish materialists often call themselves “physicalists.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 11, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Tagged
, __k-review, aesthetics, Albert Einstein, Daniel Dennett, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, Elliott Sober, evolution, intelligent design, Jerry Fodor, Karl Popper, materialists, methodological naturalism, Michael Behe, Michael Egnor, Nancy Pearcey, Nature (journal), Phillip E. Johnson, philosophers, PNAS, science, selection, Summer Seminars, theory of mind, Thomas Kuhn, Thomas Nagel, William Whewell}

Philosophers Want Back into Science

_{Science & Culture
April 11, 2019

Intelligent Design, Philosophy

8}

One might call the 20th century a “philosopher of the gaps” period, with scientists basking in the headlines and philosophy finding less and less to do. Read More ›