Can Darwinists Condemn Hitler and Remain Consistent with Their Darwinism?

_{Richard Weikart
October 27, 2011

Bioethics

1}

Applying Darwinian insights to morality is not distorting the theory at all (as it would be for someone to draw moral implications from relativity theory). Rather, it is explicitly part and parcel of Darwin's own theory of human evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 27, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, chimpanzees, Darwinism, DNA, Jonathan Wells, junk DNA}

Junk-of-the-Gaps Argument Shrinks Again

_{Casey Luskin
October 27, 2011

Intelligent Design

5}

Another prominent paper has continued this trend of pushing defenders of junk DNA into yet smaller gaps in the genome. Read More ›

Close-up of a door knocker in the shape of an uroboros, an ancient symbol depicting a serpent (or dragon) eating its own tail, often interpreted as a symbol for eternal cyclic renewal, Italy

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
October 27, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __edited, 1 percent myth, chimpanzees, circular reasoning, common ancestry, DNA, evolution, genetic similarity, junk DNA, proteins, PZ Myers}

Darwinian Logic: The Latest on Chimp and Human DNA

_{Jonathan Wells
October 27, 2011

Evolution, Scientific Reasoning

3}

Picture an Ouroboros, the alchemical symbol of a snake with its own tail in its mouth. Do you get the feeling that Darwinian "logic" is taking us nowhere? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
October 6, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __k-review, Charles Darwin, Darwinian theory, Jonathan Wells, Joseph Thornton, junk DNA, The Myth of Junk DNA}

The Receding Myth of “Junk DNA”

_{Jonathan Wells
October 6, 2011

Evolution, Genetics

1}

Since I published The Myth of Junk DNA in May, there has been no response from the pro-Darwin authors I criticized in it. On September 23, 2011, however, John Farrell reviewed it for the Huffington Post. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 24, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinian theory, Granville Sewell, intelligent design, John Farrell, junk DNA, plagiarism, The Myth of Junk DNA}

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: HuffPost Reviews The Myth of Junk DNA

_{Science & Culture
September 24, 2011

Intelligent Design

1}

Yes, it's the venerable principle of Darwinian theory that says: Whatever turns out to be the case is retrospectively recognized as having been exactly what the theory predicted. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 6, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, butterfly wings, junk DNA, Metamorphosis}

Divining Darwin in Butterfly Genes

_{Science & Culture
September 6, 2011

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

A team of scientists carefully examined genomes of a butterfly and a silkworm. What they found was interesting, but dubious as an example of evolutionary ancestry. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 15, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Life Sciences
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA, pseudogenes}

New Scientific Research Papers Published Since Myth of Junk DNA Confirm Jonathan Wells’ Thesis

_{Casey Luskin
July 15, 2011

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science

6}

Recently published literature has overwhelmingly confirmed Jonathan Wells' thesis in The Myth of Junk DNA, refuting the ID critics who still cling to the neo-Darwinian story. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 14, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA}

The Myth of Junk DNA Grows With the Telling

_{Science & Culture
July 14, 2011

Intelligent Design

1}

It looks like Dr. Wells sampled the water just as the tide was starting to come in, and it's still rising. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert L. Crowther, II

Date
July 1, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA}

“If Meyer taught us to read DNA, Wells teaches us to sing it.”

_{Robert Crowther
July 1, 2011

Evolution

1}

The Myth of Junk DNA is a well-written book that manages to accomplish two separate tasks: to silence the Darwinists who claimed that recent genomic discoveries supported their dystopic version of The Signature in the Cell; and to bring all of us up-to-date on the breath-taking mysteries being decoded from this ancient script. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 24, 2011

Categories
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __edited, bias, Francisco Ayala, junk DNA}

At Forbes, John Farrell Joins in “Ayala’ing” of Jonathan Wells

_{David Klinghoffer
May 24, 2011

Science Reporting

4}

Farrell thinks the myth of junk DNA is itself a myth -- that "scientists never dismissed junk DNA in the literature." In other words, Wells has set up a straw man. Of course, not having looked at the book, Farrell can't have consulted Dr. Wells's fifty pages of notes documenting his argument. Read More ›