Tag: Dr. Dan

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
August 5, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, ankylosing spondylitis, autism, cancer, Crohn’s disease, disease, Dr. Dan, env, function, gag, genes, illness, intelligent design, junk DNA, LINE-1 elements, mutations, non-coding DNA, pol, schizophrenia, Stanford University, transcriptome}

Disease-Associated “Junk” DNA Is Evidence of Function

_{Casey Luskin
August 5, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Medicine

11}

When you mess with the “junk,” the result is problems. That doesn’t sound like junk DNA to me. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 22, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, bacterial flagellum, centromeres, complex specified information, Dan Stern Cardinale, Discovery Institute, DNA, Dr. Dan, evolution, intelligent design, metabolism, mRNA, organ systems, probabilistic resources, protein translation, proteome, regulatory regions, Rutgers University, sequence specificity, topoisomerase, YouTube videos}

On Intelligent Design, Dr. Dan Appears to Equivocate

_{Science and Culture
July 22, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

In an ongoing dialogue with ID proponents, Rutgers University biologist Dan Stern Cardinale (aka Dr. Dan) has replied to us with a recent video. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
June 24, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Candida, centromere, chromosome, Dan Stern Cardinale, David Klinghoffer, debates, DNA, Dr. Dan, Drosophila, kinetochore, yeast}

Documentation for Dr. Dan

_{Science and Culture
June 24, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

We hope Rutgers biologist Dan Stern Cardinale finds these citations of interest. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 21, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologists, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, evolution, Evolution News, function, geologists, intelligent design, Jonathan McLatchie, junk DNA, kinetochore, Long Story Short, Richard Sternberg, Rutgers University, Twitter}

Dr. Dan Has a Taste for Debate

_{David Klinghoffer
June 21, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

From what I’ve been told, there are many examples of “non-conserved” regions having sequence-independent functions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 18, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, bacteria, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, Darwinian evolution, Dr. Dan, Eigen’s paradox, errors, expectations, foresight, hot dogs, intelligent design, junk DNA, Long Story Short, Manfred Eigen, recognition, recycling, repair, ribosomes, Rutgers University}

DNA Repair and the Origin of Life: Here’s the Problem

_{David Klinghoffer
June 18, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Perhaps out there, watching along with you, is another Professor Dan Stern Cardinale who is imagining how easy it’s going to be to take this one apart. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
June 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, Dr. Dan, evolution, function, genome, ID the Future, intelligent design, Jonathan McLatchie, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, podcast, Rutgers University}

Casey Luskin Reflects on His Recent Junk DNA Debate

_{Andrew McDiarmid
June 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

For decades we were told that non-coding regions of our DNA are littered with evolutionary junk. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 24, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, Discovery Institute, DNA, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, ERVs, Evolution News, Ewan Birney, function, genome, junk DNA, Nature (journal), pseudogenes, repetitive DNA, RNA, Rutgers University, YouTube channels}

Did Dr. Dan Make Us Change Our Position on Junk DNA?

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 24, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

13}

This claim is totally false and it perhaps reflects Dr. Dan’s wish to find a positive spin on the substance of what happened during the debate. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, cell types, Creation Myths, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, evolution, function, genome, Hox genes, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, lncRNAs, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Methods, non-coding DNA, non-coding RNAs, Paulo Amaral, Richard Sternberg, RNA, Rutgers University, scientific literature, The NonSequitur Show}

Reflections on Casey Luskin’s Debate with “Dr. Dan”

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

I commend Dr. Dan for being an amicable dialogue partner and for his good faith attempt to engage substantively with the relevant scientific issues. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 13, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, dog, Dr. Dan, embryogenesis, embryonic stem cells, enzymes, euchromatin, evolution, function, genome, Genome Biology, humans, intelligent design, junk DNA, LINE-1 elements, macaque, methylation, miRNAs, mouse, Nature (journal), non-coding RNAs, peer-reviewed literature, repetitive elements, Rutgers University, Science (journal), transposable elements}

From the “Junk DNA” Files: Can “Degraded” LINE Elements Still Be Functional?

_{Jonathan McLatchie, Richard Sternberg, and Casey Luskin
May 13, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

22}

On May 2, Casey Luskin had an online debate with Professor Daniel Stern Cardinale, an evolutionary biologist at Rutgers University. Read More ›