Tag: Douglas Axe | Page 12 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 11, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, academia, atoms, cells, Darwinism, David Gelernter, Douglas Axe, Evolution News, Günter Bechly, hope, ideology, intelligent design, john lennox, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, News, Oxford University, reputation, Return of the God Hypothesis, scholars, scientists, social media, Stephen Meyer, universe, Yale University}

Intelligent Design — Join the Resistance While There’s Still Time

_{David Klinghoffer
November 11, 2020

Intelligent Design

3}

We may be in a precious window when ID scientists can still reach any interested reader, anywhere in the world, any day of the year. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 9, 2020

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Physics
Tagged
, Against the Tide, Bible, Christianity, Douglas Axe, faith, God's Undertaker, intelligent design, Judaism, mathematician, science, Stephen Meyer, theism, universe, William A. Dembski}

John Lennox: Scientific Evidence for a Design Behind the Universe

_{David Klinghoffer
November 9, 2020

Biology, Intelligent Design, Physics

5}

"I greatly respect other people who, sometimes at great risk, have decided that they are going to say these kinds of things in public." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 6, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, chemists, computer simulation, Douglas Axe, evolution, golf, Hamlet, Harvard University, intelligent design, Jonathan Witt, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, natural selection, optimization, PNAS, polypeptides, protein evolution, proteins, Richard Dawkins, syllogism, Undeniable (book), Weasel program}

Are Proteins Attracted to Function?

_{Science & Culture
November 6, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

Doug Axe showed that functional space is a tiny fraction of sequence space in proteins. Evolutionists think they found a shortcut. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 2, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, academy, bullies, debates, Douglas Axe, evolutionary biology, expertise, intelligent design, professors, self-censorship}

Douglas Axe: The Sway of Self-Image in Evolutionary Debates

_{David Klinghoffer
November 2, 2020

Biology, Evolution

3}

You really cannot understand debates about evolution without appreciating the ego — the male ego in particular, you could argue — that is involved. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 26, 2020

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Cosmology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Physics
Tagged
, censors, censorship, creator, Darwinists, Douglas Axe, intelligent design, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Michael Denton, molecular machines, Ola Hössjer, reputation, Return of the God Hypothesis, specified complexity, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, The Miracle of the Cell, water, William A. Dembski}

Is Fine-Tuning “More Extreme” in Biology or Cosmology?

_{David Klinghoffer
October 26, 2020

Biology, Chemistry, Cosmology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences, Physics

3}

As authors Thorvaldsen and Hössjer say, “Biology is inherently more complicated than the large-scale universe and so fine-tuning is even more a feature.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
October 19, 2020

Categories
Anatomy
Engineering
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, 3D printing, amoeba, beetles, crabs, Darwinism, Douglas Axe, embryonic development, eukaryotes, evolution, functional whole, Harvard University, Hydra, Illustra Media, information, intelligent design, liver, Michael Levin, morphogenesis, octopuses, paramecium, The Scientist, Tufts University, Undeniable (book)}

Morphogenesis: Coding for Shape

_{Science & Culture
October 19, 2020

Anatomy, Engineering, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

How do you get a 3-D shape from a linear code? That is the puzzle of morphogenesis. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 17, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Tagged
, Bayesian reasoning, Brian Josephson, Cambridge University, Cavendish Laboratory, Columbia University, computer simulation, David Kipping, Douglas Axe, evolution, Jonathan McLatchie, Michael Egnor, Nobel Prize, rain, Scientific American, Twitter}

ID by Another Name? Astronomer Says 50 Percent Chance We’re Living in Computer Simulation

_{David Klinghoffer
October 17, 2020

Intelligent Design, Mathematics

2}

Of course, an 80 percent chance that we live in an intelligently design world compares favorably with only a 50 percent chance. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 14, 2020

Categories
Biology
Faith & Science
Political Science
Tagged
, abortion, Bill Nye, dogmatism, Douglas Axe, embryology, empirical science, environmentalism, experimentation, falsification, human rights, humanities, ideology, John Zmirak, Jonathan Wells, materialistic philosophy, materialistic science, Moses, Nature (journal), nature rights, New Atheism, Politics, religion, sex, The Stream, trust, Twitter, Wesley Smith}

When “Science” Becomes a Cult

_{David Klinghoffer
October 14, 2020

Biology, Faith & Science, Political Science

7}

The problem comes when, in order to win our acceptance, double-talk is used to pretend that a cult is something other than what it is. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 5, 2020

Categories
Biology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Tagged
, Anthropic Principle, Darwinian mechanisms, Douglas Axe, Günter Bechly, information, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Latin, Michael Behe, molecular biology, Ola Hössjer, peer review, protein evolution, Robert J. Marks II, scientists, statistics, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, Stockholm University, Undeniable (book), waiting-time problem, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Breakout Paper in Journal of Theoretical Biology Explicitly Supports Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
October 5, 2020

Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Mathematics

17}

If the paper is any indication, appearing as it does in a prominent journal, some of the suffocating constraints on ID advocacy may be coming off. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
October 2, 2020

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, agriculture, Ann Gauger, cancel culture, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, creator, Darwinists, disclaimer, Discovery Institute, discrimination, Douglas Axe, Foresight (book), Günter Bechly, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Nobel laureates, Ola Hössjer, peer review, Return of the God Hypothesis, Robert J. Marks II, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, Stockholm University}

Despite Darwinists’ Cancel Culture, Intelligent Design Has a Breakthrough in Biology Journal

_{John G. West
October 2, 2020

Biology, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

3}

The article survived peer-review and was accepted for publication despite the open hostility of the journal’s top editors! Read More ›