Fox acknowledges what philosopher Thomas Nagel calls the "fiendishly difficult problem" of the origin of life, but he seems to think that, given time, we'll sort it all out.
Read More ›
Johnson's work showed that there are credible criticisms of Darwinian evolution that come from a strictly scientific standpoint rather than a religious one.
Read More ›
Phil Johnson ascended majestically above the usual point of skepticism. It was the great case of Darwin et al v. the Western Religious Tradition that occupied his attention.
Read More ›
Darwin's great promoter Thomas Henry Huxley, anticipating the dawn of evolutionism in the 1850s, knew that he was living through a New Reformation. Today we are witnessing a new Counter-Reformation.
Read More ›
ID critics quickly learned that the most effective way to target ID was not to address its arguments, but to make accusations of secret, sinister motives among proponents.
Read More ›
Darwin-as-philosophy inspired sociological jurisprudence and legal realism before mixing in the late 20th century with dissident politics and continental critical theory to form the intellectual foundation of the Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement.
Read More ›
Any real scientist would see that they are in fact the product of chance and necessity alone which fully account for their coming into existence and being picked up by Google Earth.
Read More ›
Even oft-cited examples such as Darwin's finches and antibiotic resistance appear to typically involve no more than phenotypic plasticity and the selection of irreducibly complex traits already in existence.
Read More ›
