Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

Darwin lobby

John-Calvert
Photo: John Calvert, courtesy of Bill Harris.

Remembering John Calvert, a Bulldog for Objective Scientific Education

Calvert's tenacious commitment to seeing origins science taught objectively in public schools serves as a courageous example. Read More ›
Przewalski's horse
Photo: Przewalski's horse, by Solar Olga, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

Chromosomal Fusion and Correcting Mistakes: A Retrospective on an Old Debate

The main evidence that Dr. Scott cites to argue that chromosomal fusions aren’t necessarily deleterious comes not from humans but from horses. Read More ›
information
Image credit: Nathaniel Shuman, via Unsplash.

Information from Nothing? Darwinists Must Believe It

Some evolutionists are becoming bolder in their assertions that information can arise from stochastic processes without intelligence. Read More ›
Charles Darwin

Michael Flannery on the Unraveling Darwinian Paradigm

Evolution is so well established, says a Darwin lobbyist, that questioning it is like doubting that matter is made of atoms. Really? Read More ›
Evolution is a fact

Sociology Journal: Why Lobbyists So Persistently Call Evolution a “Fact”

The paper could cause a stir, since it has violated an “implicit agreement” that mainstream academics should never criticize public advocates of evolution. Read More ›

Digging Into Granville Sewell’s Peer-Reviewed Paper Challenging Darwinian Evolution

Dr. Sewell is fully aware of the standard objections to the classical version of the second law argument, but his thesis is not the classic unsophisticated version of the argument. Read More ›

Darwin Lobbyists Urge Ban on “Dangerous” Words in State Science Standards

If you needed more evidence that the Darwin lobby wants to turn science education into little more than unquestioned propaganda, take a look at the outlandish new “study” evaluating state science standards published by two officials of the National Center for Science Education, the leading Darwin-only lobbying group. Published by a journal devoted to the one-sided teaching of evolution, the article by Louise Mead and Anton Mates condemns various states for filling their science standards with “dangerous” words and “creationist jargon.” Just what are these “dangerous” words that must be banned? “Assess,” “Analyze,” “Evaluate,” and “Critique.” No, I’m not kidding. Evolutionists typically claim that the evidence for modern Darwinism is “overwhelming.” But they act as if they know that the Read More ›

© Discovery Institute