Tag: “consensus science” | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Coppedge

Date
April 22, 2022

Categories
Biology
Engineering
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, Current Biology, Dan-Eric Nilsson, Darwinian theory, David Berlinski, Doubts About Darwin, evolution, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, light-sensitive spot, Neil Thomas, photoreceptors, retina, Richard Dawkins, The Design Revolution, Thomas Woodward, vertebrate eye}

Darwinists Seek to Explain the Eye’s Engineering Perfection

_{David Coppedge
April 22, 2022

Biology, Engineering, Evolution, Intelligent Design

8}

First, they turn evolution into an engineer. Personification is a common ploy by Darwinists. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 1, 2022

Categories
Faith & Science
Geology
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Adam and Eve, Casey Luskin, Christianity, dogmatism, Evangelical Christians, Hank Hanegraaff, Hebrew Bible, human origins, plate tectonics}

Luskin: Adam and Eve and the Evolving Scientific Consensus

_{David Klinghoffer
April 1, 2022

Faith & Science, Geology, Human Origins and Anthropology

2}

Scientists have become much more reticent about saying the first couple must be no more than a product of the ancient Hebrew imagination. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 24, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Faith & Science
Human Exceptionalism
Tagged
, “consensus science”, atheism, Baruch Spinoza, COVID-19, Darwinian materialism, Humanize, intelligent design, mainstream media, materialism, Michael Medved, Return of the God Hypothesis, Richard Lewontin, Salon, Stephen Meyer, Steven Pinker, Thanksgiving, Wesley Smith}

Thanksgiving and the Frailty of Scientific Atheism

_{David Klinghoffer
November 24, 2021

Bioethics, Faith & Science, Human Exceptionalism

4}

Our bioethicist colleague Wesley Smith had a very interesting and wide-ranging conversation with Stephen Meyer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
November 15, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Adam and Eve, Adam and the Genome, Ann Gauger, BIO-Complexity, BioLogos, bottleneck, Calvin College, Christianity Today, Deborah Haarsma, Dennis Venema, DNA, Evangelical Christians, Evangelicals, evolutionary creation, evolutionary science, Francis Collins, humans, In Quest of the Historical Adam, In Quest of the Historical Adam (series), Nature Ecology and Evolution, npr, Ola Hössjer, Queen Mary University, Review of Craig's In Quest of the Historical Adam (series), Richard Buggs, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science and Human Origins, Scot McKnight, The Language of God, theistic evolution, Trinity Western University, William Lane Craig}

Lessons from the Evangelical Debate About Adam and Eve

_{Casey Luskin
November 15, 2021

Evolution, Faith & Science, Human Origins and Anthropology

20}

The standard evolutionary account of human origins holds that our population has always been in the thousands and humanity did not descend from an initial pair. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
October 5, 2021

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Andrew McDiarmid, Darwinists, evidence, evolution, hype, ID the Future, ideology, Jonathan Wells, journalists, podcast, scientific materialism, scientists, skepticism, vertebrate eye, Zombie Science (book)}

Biologist Jonathan Wells Offers a Cure for Zombie Science

_{Science & Culture
October 5, 2021

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

Wells encourages more than a modest dose of skepticism, and gives the example of the supposed “backward wiring of the vertebrate eye” as a case in point. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 9, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, “consensus science”, atheism, cognition, computer scientists, consciousness, Darwinism, David Gelernter, intelligent design, materialism, Michael Behe, mind, Mind and Cosmos, neo-Darwinian theory, philosophers, Princeton University, Public Discourse, Stephen Meyer, Thomas Nagel}

Little Book, Big Waves — Nagel’s Mind and Cosmos, Nine Years Later

_{David Klinghoffer
August 9, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

As a colleague points out, Nagel's departure from the “right-thinking consensus” is on a par with David Gelernter’s 2019 farewell to Darwinism. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 19, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Bayesian reasoning, Communist Party, conservatism, Darwinian evolution, elections, free speech, Harvey Mudd College, intelligent design, polarization, scientists, social media}

“Castro Consensus”: Scientific Paper Takes a Fresh Look at Scientific Agreement

_{David Klinghoffer
October 19, 2020

Evolution, Scientific Freedom

4}

Evolutionary orthodoxy is maintained by a “Castro Consensus.” This makes the Darwinian consensus questionable and in need of re-examination. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 2, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, “consensus science”, academic freedom, American Revolution, conservatives, Darwinism, David Coppedge, Douglas Axe, free speech, French Revolution, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, John Adams, looting, Marxism, Oregon, Portland, Richard Sternberg, rioting, Scott Minnich, Stephen Meyer, The New Criterion, The Origins of Totalitarianism, Thomas Jefferson, Wall Street Journal, Wesley Smith, William F. Buckley Jr., Yale University}

Why Intelligent Design Had to Be the First to Face the Guillotine

_{David Klinghoffer
September 2, 2020

Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

7}

In Wesley J. Smith’s phrase, in the present cultural moment, we have witnessed “the French Revolution attacking the American Revolution.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
May 28, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Big Bang, BioEssays, CDC, censorship, Centers for Disease Control, China, climate change, coronavirus, COVID-19, Darwinian evolution, incompetence, Jonathan Wells, masks, Panda's Thumb, pandemic, science denial, scientists, Steven Novella, Washington Post, World Health Organization, Yale University}

What Scientists Know

_{Michael Egnor
May 28, 2020

Intelligent Design, Medicine

5}

Our scientific elites insist that the “scientific consensus” be accepted without question. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
April 28, 2020

Categories
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, “consensus science”, Anthony Fauci, anxiety, biologists, carpenter, CDC, China, controversy, COVID-19, Darwinists, depression, diabetes, economy, epidemiology, experts, herd immunity, malnutrition, Nathan Lents, New York City, NIH, obesity, pandemic, public health, scientists, stroke, suicide, Twitter, viruses, WHO, Wuhan}

Herd Immunity, Not Herd Mentality

_{Michael Egnor
April 28, 2020

Medicine

7}

The “field of public health” is complicit in the worst episode of scientific malfeasance in the 21st century. Read More ›