Science and Culture Today | Discovering Design in Nature

^{Type
post

Date
December 6, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, BBC News, beak shape, beak size, Charles Darwin, Galápagos finches, Germans, hybridization, Japanese, Jonathan Wells, new-Darwinism, On the Origin of Species, Peter and Rosemary Grant, Princeton University, science, species, Tree of Life, Zombie Science (book)}

Zombie Watch: Debunked Finches Re-Emerge to Validate Darwin

_{Science and Culture
December 6, 2017

Evolution

6}

Another paper regurgitates a myth that was thoroughly debunked by Jonathan Wells in Zombie Science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 5, 2017

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, BioLogos, Christianity, creation, Darwinian theory, debate, Deborah Haarsma, deism, Four Views, God, heuristic, Hugh Ross, intelligent design, Ken Ham, Stephen Meyer, theism, theistic evolution, World Magazine, Young Earth Creationism}

In a Radio Debate on Theistic Evolution, Stephen Meyer Meets Deborah Haarsma of BioLogos

_{David Klinghoffer
December 5, 2017

Faith & Science

3}

Their official topic was “Are Evolution and Christianity Compatible?” but the real question addressed by Meyer is whether evolution and science are compatible. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 5, 2017

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science), beetles, Biomimetics, bivalve, eyes, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Leslie Orgel, Lund University, Mollusca, mollusk, retina, scallops, seafood, spiders, telescope, Weizmann Institute, Why Evolution Is True}

Telescope-Like Eyes in a “Simple” Mollusk

_{Science and Culture
December 5, 2017

Intelligent Design

8}

Scientists were dumbfounded to find shellfish looking at them with hundreds of elegantly designed eyes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 5, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, biological information, codebreaking, DNA, evolution, Francis Crick, intelligent design, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution}

Stephen Meyer Explains the DNA Challenge to Theistic Evolution

_{David Klinghoffer
December 5, 2017

Evolution, Faith & Science

1}

Dr. Meyer offers here a very crisp and helpful introduction to the codebreaking work of Francis Crick, and more. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 5, 2017

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Human Exceptionalism
Philosophy
Tagged
, __k-review, anthropocentrism, Big Think, Bill Nye, death, evolution, Francis Collins, human dignity, intelligent design, National Review Online, science, University College London, Wesley Smith}

A New Low for Evolutionary Ethics

_{David Klinghoffer
December 5, 2017

Bioethics, Ethics, Human Exceptionalism, Philosophy

5}

Understand that Big Think is not an obscure web journal by and for a lunatic fringe. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 4, 2017

Categories
Faith & Science
Philosophy
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, atheism, Discovery Institute, editors, evolution, Facebook Live, intelligent design, science, theism, theistic evolution, theology}

Introducing Theistic Evolution

_{David Klinghoffer
December 4, 2017

Faith & Science, Philosophy

2}

In a Facebook Live broadcast from Discovery Institute's offices, biologist Ann Gauger and I introduced a copy of the giant thousand-page tome. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
December 4, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, artificial intelligence, Carl Sagan, Dan Brown, Darwinian evolution, David Stove, extraterrestrials, fake news, intelligent design, John Gray, Karl Popper, Live Science, loneliness, Mars, MIT, naturalism, neuroscience, Sarah Jones, Stephen Hawking, Wesley J. Smith}

Mock at Your Peril! Naturalism Is a Jealous Fraud

_{Denyse O’Leary
December 4, 2017

Evolution, Physical Sciences

13}

It’s not just that media-darling disciplines ruled by naturalism fail the facts. They fail at precisely the points where they should succeed if naturalism were true. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 3, 2017

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Technology
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, antibodies, antigens, BIO-Complexity, evolution, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, human eye, intelligent design, Jonathan Bartlett, machines, Modern Synthesis, molecular machines, natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, proteins, Richard Dawkins, teleology, The Blind Watchmaker, The Selfish Gene}

Design (But Not Design) Is the New Unifying Principle of Biology

_{Science and Culture
December 3, 2017

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences, Technology

5}

The human eye is for seeing, whether or not it has any effect on genetics. However, this common-sense view has a problem. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 2, 2017

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, Alexa, Amazon, censorship, Darwinism, editors, evolution, Günter Bechly, ID the Future, intelligent design, paleontology, photography, podcast, Robert Crowther, science, Wikipedia}

Meet Günter Bechly

_{David Klinghoffer
December 2, 2017

Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

2}

So far, our readers have only had the opportunity to meet paleontologist Günter Bechly in his writing here and in a fairly short segment from a recent documentary. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
December 1, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Physical Sciences
Physics
Tagged
, __k-review, anti-science, community, conservative, definition, fact, hypothesis, ideology, objectivity, Politics, progressive, Sabine Hossenfelder, science, scientific method, scientists, social justice, truth}

Science Is Not Simply “What Scientists Do”

_{Wesley J. Smith
December 1, 2017

Evolution, Physical Sciences, Physics

3}

I was alarmed to see physicist Sabine Hossenfelder accept as a definition of ”science,” not a method, but merely “what scientists do.” Read More ›