Photo: Richard Lenski, by Zachary Blount [CC BY-SA 4.0], from Wikimedia Commons.Yesterday, Michael Behe published his detailed critique of the Science review of his book, Darwin Devolves. See, “Train Wreck of a Review: A Response to Lenski et al. in Science.”
This morning, Nathan Lents, a co-author of the review, tweeted about a new post by Richard Lenski, by far the most distinguished of the three reviewers for Science, that does what the initial review itself largely failed to do: begin to address Behe’s main argument in the book.
Lenski, in his own words. Definitely worth the read, especially now that Behe has posted a serious and reasoned response (in contrast to the preceding angry rants). We stand by our review, and I’m sure Behe stands by his book. A good day for thoughtful discussion of evolution. https://t.co/SfkJYPJVrr
— Nathan H. Lents (@nathanlents) February 15, 2019
Lenski asks, “Does Behe’s ‘First Rule’ Really Show that Evolutionary Biology Has a Big Problem?” Now that is the question of the hour. Lenski promises two additional posts as well. I’ll leave it to Professor Behe to respond, but I would say this is quite a departure — both for the respectful way in which it’s written, and for its substantive relevance. Yes, Nathan Lents, finally we agree: it is “A good day for thoughtful discussion of evolution.”
Photo: Richard Lenski, by Zachary Blount [CC BY-SA 4.0], from Wikimedia Commons.
