Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

Ten Dover Myths

Ten Myths About Dover: #1, "Judge Jones Addressed the Actual Theory of ID, Not a Straw Man"

Contrary to what you hear from the media, from evolution activists, and from Darwin defenders in academia, ID's big day in court has not yet come. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #2: "Judge Jones Is a Brilliant, Neutral Legal Scholar Who Figured Out ID"

Jones's extensive copying and the errors this introduced should undermine confidence in his ruling. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #3, "Intelligent Design Has No Peer-Reviewed Research or Publications"

In the Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling, Judge Jones claimed that ID "has not generated peer-reviewed publications." Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #4, "The Dover Ruling Refuted Intelligent Design"

On the opening day of the 2005 Dover trial, the plaintiffs' leadoff expert witness, noted anti-ID biologist Kenneth Miller. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #5, “Discovery Institute Supported Dover School Board Policy”

Our position on science education in schools had been publicly documented since 2002 -- several years before Dover. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #6, “Judge Jones, No Activist, Stayed Strictly Within His Authority”

Not only did Jones eschew judicial economy, he attempted to act as a policymaker and wandered into the relationship between science and religion. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #7 "The Dover Case Showed ID Is ‘Religious’ and a Form of ‘Creationism’"

ID arguments are scientific, and not religious, because they use the scientific method to make their claims. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #8, “Michael Behe Admitted that ID Is No More Scientific than Astrology”

Did Behe really concede that ID is no more scientific than astrology? No. Yet we see this myth repeated all over the Internet. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute