Tag: strengths and weaknesses | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 31, 2018

Categories
Biology
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, Center for Science and Culture, communication, Critical Analysis, debate, education, evolution, high school, ID the Future, podcast, Rob Crowther, Sarah Chaffee, strengths and weaknesses, students, teacher, Western civilization}

Great Idea: Let Students Debate Evolution!

_{David Klinghoffer
October 31, 2018

Biology, Science Education

2}

If standard Darwinian theory is really as ironclad as we are commanded to assume, then the exercise should reinforce belief in evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 23, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom, creationism, Darwinian theory, Discovery Institute, education, evolution, Evolution News, India, intelligent design, Robert Crowther, Science Education Policy, strengths and weaknesses, Wall Street Journal}

In Indian Politics, Evolution News Helps to Stir Things Up

_{David Klinghoffer
January 23, 2018

Evolution, Science Education

4}

An Indian Cabinet minister, Satyapal Singh, with responsibility for education, had noted that Darwinian evolution is “scientifically wrong” and “not scientific.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
July 21, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Science
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, Alabama, Indiana, Louisiana, Louisiana Science Education Act, Oklahoma, science education, South Dakota, strengths and weaknesses, Texas}

State Action on Science Education: 2017 in a Nutshell

_{Sarah Chaffee
July 21, 2017

Evolution, Science, Science Education

2}

All this represents movement toward the ultimate goal: the best science education for public school students around the country. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 15, 2017

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Science Education
Tagged
, __nedited, "teach the controversy", evolutionary theory, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, persistent scientific errors, Ray Bohlin, Science Education Policy, strengths and weaknesses, Texas, Zombie Science (book)}

For the Public School Biology Teacher, Zombie Science Makes an Outstanding Resource

_{David Klinghoffer
June 15, 2017

Biology, Evolution, Science Education

2}

Where do you turn for a reliable, responsible resource to help you clarify the issues for your students? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
May 26, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom, Darwin's House of Cards, education, evolution, PLOS Biology, strengths and weaknesses, Third Way of Evolution, Tom Bethell}

Should Students “Accept” Evolution – Or Think Critically About It?

_{Sarah Chaffee
May 26, 2017

Evolution, Science Education, Scientific Freedom

5}

It’s strange to speak of “acceptance” of a scientific theory, as if it were something very different, like a religious doctrine. Read More ›

South Dakota State Capital Building Hughes County Pierre SD

^{Type
post

Date
February 21, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, "teach the controversy", academic freedom, censorship, critical thinking, education policy, Holocaust denial, scientific inquiry, South Dakota, strengths and weaknesses}

Disregarding Fake News from Darwin Promoters, South Dakota Scientist Applauds Academic Freedom Bill

_{Science and Culture
February 21, 2017

Evolution, Science Education, Scientific Freedom

3}

This year, South Dakota has an opportunity to encourage more scientific inquiry in the classroom. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 30, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Science Education
Tagged
, __nedited, "teach the controversy", popular opinion, strengths and weaknesses, survey}

#3 of Our Top Stories of 2016: Poll Shows Broad Support for Teaching Evidence For and Against Darwin

_{Science and Culture
December 30, 2016

Evolution, Science Education

3}

79 percent of Democrats support teaching the evidence for and against Darwin's theory, and so do 82 percent of independents and 85 percent of Republicans. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
March 7, 2016

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __nedited, "teach the controversy", fact check, Lynn Margulis, strengths and weaknesses}

On Teaching the Evolution Controversy, Misconceptions from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

_{Sarah Chaffee
March 7, 2016

Science Education

3}

There is ongoing debate over whether evolutionary mechanisms can explain life's diversity. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
October 5, 2015

Categories
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __nedited, "teach the controversy", “consensus science”, academic freedom bills, climate change, Dissent from Darwinism, Explore Evolution, Neo-Darwinism, rhetoric, scientific inquiry, Smithsonian Institution, strengths and weaknesses}

Thinking Critically about Opposition to Teaching the Controversy

_{Sarah Chaffee
October 5, 2015

Science Education, Scientific Freedom

5}

Smithsonian's recent article is filled with flawed logic. Read More ›

school boy decides examples math wrong on chalkboard background, education concept

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 22, 2006

Categories
History of Science
Legal Science (jurisprudence)
Science Education
Tagged
, __nedited, creation science, creationism, defining terms, Edwards v. Aguillard, exclusion, fact check, history of id, metanarrative, misinformation, peer-reviewed, propaganda, rhetoric, Ronald L. Numbers, strengths and weaknesses, The Design Inference}

What’s Up with Ronald Numbers? An Analysis of the Darwinist Metanarrative in the Journal of Clinical Investigation (Part I)

_{Casey Luskin
June 22, 2006

History of Science, Legal Science (jurisprudence), Science Education

9}

[Editor’s Note: The three individual installments of this series can be seen here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. The final complete article, What’s Up with Ronald Numbers? An Analysis of the Darwinist Metanarrative in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, can be found here.] Ronald Numbers is a widely respected historian of science. He is an exceptional scholar who has garnered the respect of people on all sides of this debate. However, a recent article in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, “Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action,” co-authored by, among others, Ronald L. Numbers, Elliot Sober [anti-ID philosopher], and Terese Berceau [anti-ID legislator], gives one pause to wonder if Numbers is shifting his role from commentator, Read More ›