Tag: Signature in the Cell | Page 4 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 27, 2022

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, creationism, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, deduction, DNA, evolution, inference, intelligent design, multiverse, panspermia, RNA world, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, YouTube videos}

Watch: Kid Explains Intelligent Design to His Dad

_{David Klinghoffer
January 27, 2022

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

The lucidity of the younger individual’s grasp of ID is quite something. Tor could probably help out in tutoring some adult ID critics I can think of. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 21, 2021

Categories
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Science Education
Tagged
, aliens, Big Bang, Big Tech, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, Darwin's Doubt, evolution, Evolution: Bacteria to Beethoven, free speech, intelligent design, Internet, PragerU, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, YouTube videos}

Five New Videos with Stephen Meyer on PragerU — Our Impact Is About to Explode

_{David Klinghoffer
December 21, 2021

Cosmology, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences, Science Education

3}

This is a major advance for intelligent design. Congratulations to Dr. Meyer, to PragerU, and thank you to our supporters for making all that we do possible. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 4, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Tagged
, Cambridge University, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinian theory, Discovery Institute Press, Final Solution, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Jacques Barzun, James LeFanu, Karl Marx, Michael Flannery, Nazi Germany, New York Times, purpose, Return of the God Hypothesis, Richard Hofstadter, Richard Wagner, Richard Weikart, Signature in the Cell, Soviet Union, Stephen Meyer, The Descent of Man, The Restoration of Man}

Recognizing the “Transformative” Impact of Barzun’s Darwin, Marx, Wagner, Eighty Years Later

_{David Klinghoffer
June 4, 2021

Bioethics

4}

Literary critic M. D. Aeschliman sketches the intellectual evolution that connects Barzun with later Darwin critics. The latest is Stephen Meyer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 1, 2021

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, amino-acid sequences, Ann Gauger, BioLogos, Brian Miller, Caltech, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Darrel Falk, Darwin's Doubt, David Snoke, Douglas Axe, Eric Davidson, evolutionary biologists, evolutionary creation, gene regulatory networks, genes, GRNs, intelligent design, Michael Behe, population genetics, protein folds, proteins, purifying selection, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution}

Darrel Falk’s Volte-Face on the Cambrian Explosion

_{Casey Luskin
June 1, 2021

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

14}

I appreciate that Dr. Falk and his colleagues at BioLogos would like to engage in a productive “dialogue” with proponents of intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
May 28, 2021

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Cambridge University, chemists, Darrel Falk, Darwinian evolution, directed evolution, early Earth, Gerald F. Joyce, prebiotic conditions, Retraction Crisis, Return of the God Hypothesis, ribozymes, RNA self-replication, RNA world, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, Times Literary Supplement}

Darrel Falk Badly Mischaracterizes RNA World Experiments. . .and Stephen Meyer

_{Brian Miller
May 28, 2021

Biology, Intelligent Design

17}

Falk claims that Meyer misled his readers by not mentioning an allegedly significant newer result. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 12, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, cosmic fine-tuning, Darwin's Doubt, faith, intelligent design, personal God, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, theism, universe}

Stephen Meyer: Why You Should Pre-Order Return of the God Hypothesis Now

_{David Klinghoffer
March 12, 2021

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

2}

By enlarging his scope to include the origin of the universe, Meyer reveals why science confirms not merely a generic design in nature but a personal God. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 3, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, Darwin's Doubt, excerpt, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Zoom}

Early Praise for Meyer’s Return of the God Hypothesis — And a Preorder Offer

_{David Klinghoffer
February 3, 2021

Faith & Science

1}

Meyer's latest "makes a strong case for the identity of the designer as a personal God," says University of Georgia biochemist Russell Carlson. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
December 17, 2020

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, Center for Science and Culture, college students, colleges, COVID-19, Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Black Box, Darwin’s Three Big Ideas that Impacted Humanity, Darwinians, despair, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, ID the Future, loneliness, Long Story Short, meaninglessness, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, monograph, professors, Return of the God Hypothesis, Richard Dawkins, Science Uprising, Secrets of the Cell, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, Summer Seminars, YouTube videos}

“Blind Evolution… Explained Everything”

_{John G. West
December 17, 2020

Faith & Science

4}

COVID-19 isn’t our only pandemic. There is also a pandemic of loneliness and despair. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 16, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, AlphaFold, amino-acid sequences, artificial intelligence, chaperones, DeepMind, DNA, Douglas Axe, engineers, enzymes, Evolution News, evolutionary algorithms, Ewen Callaway, Go (game), hyperdrive, intelligent design, Nature News, No Free Lunch, Nobel Prize, proteins, reverse-engineering, Science (journal), Signature in the Cell, Undeniable (book), University of Maryland, William A. Dembski}

Protein Folding Breakthrough: Evolution or Design?

_{Science and Culture
December 16, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

8}

DeepMind, the AI company that beat human Go gamers with AlphaGo, has made progress in solving the protein folding problem. But who deserves the credit? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 2, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, "survival of the fittest", amino acids, Charles Thaxton, code, codons, Darwinian evolution, DNA, double helix, Escherichia coli, genetic code, information, intelligent design, materialists, mind, natural selection, PNAS, probability, proteins, Roger Olsen, Rutgers University, Second Law of Thermodynamics, serine, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, The Mystery of Life’s Origin, thermodynamics, Walter Bradley}

Missing the Point: Codes Are Not Products of Physics (Updated)

_{Science and Culture
December 2, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

Elaborate schemes to explain the origin of the genetic code from the laws of physics and chemistry miss the whole point about codes. Read More ›