Tag: Sarah Jones

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
July 15, 2021

Categories
Science Reporting
Tagged
, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, Bruce Chapman, Center for Science and Culture, Christopher Rufo, classroom, critical race theory, Darwinists, Discovery Institute, Dover trial, education, education policy, Evangelical Christians, evolutionary theory, intelligent design, New York Magazine, New York Times, Sarah Jones, strengths and weaknesses, students}

Critical Race Theory and Intelligent Design: The Mixed-Up Comparison of Sarah Jones

_{John G. West
July 15, 2021

Science Reporting

7}

Sarah Jones essentially argues that worries about critical race theory have been ginned up by conservative provocateurs. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
June 16, 2019

Categories
Bioethics
Medicine
Tagged
, __k-review, antibiotic resistance, Barack Obama, conflict of interest, dehydration, Florida, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, ideology, infection, Joe Biden, medical treatment, Michael Schiavo, New York Magazine, Noa Pothoven, religious right, Sarah Jones, starvation, Terri Schiavo, U.S. Senate}

Historical Revisionism in the Terri Schiavo Case

_{Wesley J. Smith
June 16, 2019

Bioethics, Medicine

4}

The case tore this country apart, and alas, proved a significant accelerant to the spread of the culture of death in America. But it was not a matter of left versus right. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
December 4, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, artificial intelligence, Carl Sagan, Dan Brown, Darwinian evolution, David Stove, extraterrestrials, fake news, intelligent design, John Gray, Karl Popper, Live Science, loneliness, Mars, MIT, naturalism, neuroscience, Sarah Jones, Stephen Hawking, Wesley J. Smith}

Mock at Your Peril! Naturalism Is a Jealous Fraud

_{Denyse O’Leary
December 4, 2017

Evolution, Physical Sciences

13}

It’s not just that media-darling disciplines ruled by naturalism fail the facts. They fail at precisely the points where they should succeed if naturalism were true. Read More ›