Tag: non-coding DNA

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
July 19, 2025

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologists, Casey Luskin, DNA, evolutionary junk, function, gene regulation, genome, ID the Future, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, junk DNA, microRNA, Nobel Committee, Nobel Prize, non-coding DNA, non-coding regions, podcast, Richard Sternberg, The Myth of Junk DNA, William Dembski}

Another Case Where “Junk” Myth Impeded Science

_{Andrew McDiarmid
July 19, 2025

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

For decades, evolutionary biologists considered non-coding regions of DNA as evolutionary junk. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
May 12, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Tagged
, biology, Christianity, David Klinghoffer, DNA, evolution, genes, genetic instructions, geneticists, genome, Georg Cantor, immaterial genome, infinite sets, intelligent design, Judaism, leather shoes, Life Itself, material genome, materialism, non-coding DNA, pearls, Plato, proteins, recombination, Richard Sternberg, Robert Rosen, set theory, sneakers, transposable elements, tsimtsum}

The Immaterial Genome: Richard Sternberg’s Labor of Love

_{Ann Gauger
May 12, 2025

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Mathematics

6}

Rick Sternberg's thought has the potential to demonstrate conclusively the need for an intelligent designer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
February 27, 2025

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Physics
Tagged
, Albuquerque, Cambrian Explosion, Center for Science and Culture, DNA, Energy, enzymes, evolution, fossil record, genes, information, initial conditions, intelligent design, junk DNA, life, matter, mutations, natural selection, non-coding DNA, overlapping codes, physical constants, proteins, space-time, spliceosome, universe, University of New Mexico, video}

Michael Kent: “12 Discoveries That Have Changed the Debate about Design”

_{Granville Sewell
February 27, 2025

Biology, Cosmology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences, Physics

2}

Michael Kent is a Fellow with the Center for Science and Culture and a recently retired bio-scientist from Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 14, 2025

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Dan Graur, Darwinian scientists, ENCODE, ERVs, evolution, genome, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, Long Story Short, non-coding DNA, onions, predictions, pseudogenes, science stopper, The Codes of Life, University of Houston}

New “Long Story” Short: “ERVs, Pseudogenes, & Onions”

_{David Klinghoffer
January 14, 2025

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

Intelligent design is a “science stopper”? It “makes people stupid”? These are among the claims of some smart scientists who ought to know better. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
August 7, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, bibliography, BioEssays, disease, ENCODE, function, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, paradigm shift, Research, scientific literature}

Defending Our Literature Survey on Function for Junk DNA

_{Casey Luskin
August 7, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

Our list only scratches the surface of the literature, and you can’t negate the existence of that body of literature through a few complaints. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
August 5, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, ankylosing spondylitis, autism, cancer, Crohn’s disease, disease, Dr. Dan, env, function, gag, genes, illness, intelligent design, junk DNA, LINE-1 elements, mutations, non-coding DNA, pol, schizophrenia, Stanford University, transcriptome}

Disease-Associated “Junk” DNA Is Evidence of Function

_{Casey Luskin
August 5, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Medicine

11}

When you mess with the “junk,” the result is problems. That doesn’t sound like junk DNA to me. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
June 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, Dr. Dan, evolution, function, genome, ID the Future, intelligent design, Jonathan McLatchie, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, podcast, Rutgers University}

Casey Luskin Reflects on His Recent Junk DNA Debate

_{Andrew McDiarmid
June 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

For decades we were told that non-coding regions of our DNA are littered with evolutionary junk. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
June 1, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Darwinian evolution, Eric Anderson, evolution, evolutionary narrative, ID the Future, intelligent design, junk DNA, Long Story Short, materialism, non-coding DNA, podcast, science stopper}

How the Myth of Junk DNA Hindered Science

_{Andrew McDiarmid
June 1, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

For decades, we’ve been told that only a tiny percentage of DNA is functional and that the vast majority is useless junk. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, cell types, Creation Myths, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, evolution, function, genome, Hox genes, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, lncRNAs, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Methods, non-coding DNA, non-coding RNAs, Paulo Amaral, Richard Sternberg, RNA, Rutgers University, scientific literature, The NonSequitur Show}

Reflections on Casey Luskin’s Debate with “Dr. Dan”

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

I commend Dr. Dan for being an amicable dialogue partner and for his good faith attempt to engage substantively with the relevant scientific issues. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 2, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, evolution, evolutionists, function, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, peer-reviewed literature, Rutgers University, technical literature}

“Junk DNA” from Three Perspectives: Some Key Quotes

_{Casey Luskin
May 2, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

19}

Many of these quotes are from mainstream scientific papers, books, or book chapters of a technical nature. Read More ›