News
KU Darwinists Duck Intelligent Design Debate
In Ohio Darwinist Admits Plan to Burn Evolution Critics
Dogmatic Darwinists Strike Again: Americans United for the Separation of Students and Science
Discovery Institute Chides Ohio Activists for Trying to Dumb Down Evolution Education and Censor Science
Darwinists Want To Ban Intelligent Design From Not Just Science Classrooms, But All Classrooms
Dover in Review: An Analysis of Judge Jones’ Flawed Ruling in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
During the Christmas break, I posted a four-part series analyzing various issues surrounding the Dover intelligent design ruling. In case you missed it, I am reposting the first three parts of the series here in one place. The analysis addresses the following questions:
- Is Judge Jones an activist judge?
- Did Judge Jones read the evidence submitted to him in the Dover trial?
- Did Judge Jones accurately describe the content and early versions of the ID textbook Of Pandas and People?
The fourth part of the series can still be accessed here.
I. Is Judge Jones an activist judge?
Read More ›Intelligent Design is Empirically Testable and Makes Predictions
In Reporting Hot Button Issues Like Evolution It’s Hard for the Media to Not “Tell You What It Means”
“Irreducible Hostility”: Knippenberg Analyzes Dover Judge’s Muddled Thinking on Intelligent Design
Professor Joseph Knippenberg of Oglethorpe Univerity has followed up his fine analysis of the Selman case with an equally insightful analysis of the Dover decision. According to Knippenberg, Judge Jones’s conclusions about the law depend upon a rather unsophisticated understanding of philosophy and theology. If ever there were need for a case study to demonstrate how the practice of law ought to rest on a foundation of liberal learning, Judge Jones’s opinion here would provide it.