Tag: Judaism | Page 5 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 17, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, alt-right, Charles Darwin, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, evolution, foresight, Holocaust denial, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Jonathan Wells, Judaism, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, motives, Old Testament, Paul Nelson, Razib Khan}

Two Ways for ID Critics, Both Lame

_{David Klinghoffer
May 17, 2019

Intelligent Design

3}

As others have said before me, one of the first things you notice about ID critics is the low level of most of their critiques. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, atheism, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, conservatism, culture, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, David Gelernter, Declaration of Independence, evolution, Jerry Coyne, Judaism, Michael Behe, National Review, Razib Khan, Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, scientists, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, Tom Wolfe, Yuval Noah Harari}

The “Fearing Evolution” Trope

_{David Klinghoffer
May 14, 2019

Evolution

3}

Razib Khan explains why “evolutionary biology is nothing for conservatives to fear,” since “it is one of the crowning achievements of modern Western civilization.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 10, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Dennis Prager, Douglas Axe, evolution, intelligent design, Judaism, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, Paul Nelson, Richard Lenski, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, The Deniable Darwin, Thomas Nagel, Tom Wolfe, Yale University}

Yale’s David Gelernter: Darwin’s Doubt Is “One of the Most Important Books in a Generation”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 10, 2019

Evolution

5}

He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Tom Gilson

Date
November 9, 2018

Categories
Faith & Science
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __k-review, atheism, bias, Christianity, Genesis, J.B.S. Haldane, Judaism, Lawrence Krauss, methodological naturalism, moral agency, Robert Pennock, science, secularism, straw man, theism, theology, Tom Gilson}

Dump the Metaphysics — How About Methodological Regularism?

_{Tom Gilson
November 9, 2018

Faith & Science, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Science

9}

Science doesn’t need methodological naturalism. It doesn’t need methodological theism, either. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 27, 2018

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Physical Sciences
Physics
Tagged
, __k-review, Cambridge University, Center for Science and Culture, Christianity, Darwin's Doubt, Deity, designer, Discovery Institute, evolution, faith, Great Minds with Michael Medved, Judaism, Michael Medved, podcast, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, theism}

Stephen Meyer’s Next Frontier: The Return of the God Hypothesis

_{David Klinghoffer
September 27, 2018

Biology, Cosmology, Physical Sciences, Physics

2}

Meyer is well known as a leading proponent of ID, the scientific alternative to theories of unguided evolution. He talks here about his exciting and important next book. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 10, 2018

Categories
Faith & Science
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __k-review, “nones”, Alfred Russel Wallace, Christianity, creation, evolution, faith, history, human origins, intelligent design, J. Warner Wallace, Judaism, materialism, Orthodox Jews, Pew Research Center, Rosh Hashanah}

On Rosh Hashanah, a Note on Origins and Evidence

_{David Klinghoffer
September 10, 2018

Faith & Science, Human Origins and Anthropology

4}

The origin and nature of man should be important to any thoughtful human being, of any religion or none. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 11, 2018

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, atheism, evolution, faith, ID the Future, intelligent design, Ira Berkowitz, Jerry Coyne, Judaism, Nonsense of a High Order, podcast, Rabbi Moshe Averick}

Listen: Intelligent Design, Atheism, and Nonsense of a High Order

_{Science and Culture
July 11, 2018

Faith & Science

1}

Rabbi Moshe Averick answers the who-designed-the-designer objection, shows how questions about God and ID can’t be shoved aside as unimportant. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 10, 2018

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Aquinas and Evolution, augustine, C.S. Lewis, Catholicism and Evolution, evolution, Father Michael Chaberek, intelligent design, Judaism, Maimonides, Protestantism, Roman Catholic, theistic evolution, Thomas Aquinas}

“Thomists Versus Thomas”

_{David Klinghoffer
January 10, 2018

Faith & Science

4}

Remarkably parallel struggles go on, as well, in Protestant and Jewish circles, whether the debate focuses on C.S. Lewis or Maimonides, Augustine of Hippo or Samson Raphael Hirsch. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 15, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Tagged
, __nedited, Ann Gauger, Center for Science and Culture, Christianity, Douglas Axe, Günter Bechly, integration, intelligent design, J.P. Moreland, John West, Jonathan Wells, Judaism, Lee Spetner, Maimonides, Paul Nelson, science, Sean McDowell, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution}

Philosopher J.P. Moreland on Theistic Evolution

_{David Klinghoffer
November 15, 2017

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Philosophy

5}

What does the new book have to offer the perplexed today that previous works don't? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
August 30, 2017

Categories
Bioethics
Human Exceptionalism
Tagged
, __k-review, artificial intelligence, Christianity, human rights, Judaism, machine, personhood, salvation, sin, strong AI, toaster, worship}

No Machine, However Sophisticated, Will Ever Possess “Rights” or “Eternal” Significance

_{Wesley J. Smith
August 30, 2017

Bioethics, Human Exceptionalism

4}

“Strong AI” machines would have no more moral importance in and of themselves than a toaster. Read More ›