Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

Jerry Coyne

Giraffe Weekend: The Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve

Darwinists have called it one of “nature’s worst designs,” “obviously a ridiculous detour,” asserting that “no engineer would ever make a mistake like that.” Read More ›

Listen: Intelligent Design, Atheism, and Nonsense of a High Order

Rabbi Moshe Averick answers the who-designed-the-designer objection, shows how questions about God and ID can’t be shoved aside as unimportant. Read More ›
Nathan Lents 2

There You Go Again, Nathan Lents

“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents. Read More ›
kudzu

Kudzu Science: Ken Miller’s The Human Instinct

Miller is one of those “settled science” bullies. Here he sets his sights on essayist Marilynne Robinson. Read More ›

With Mark Levin on Fox News, David Berlinski Talks “Evolution, Science, Progressivism”

I think it’s the first time I’ve heard a discussion of the second of law thermodynamics on cable TV. Read More ›
Human eye

Is the Human Eye Really Evidence Against Intelligent Design?

Vertebrate eyes work reasonably well, Richard Dawkins conceded, but “it is the principle of the thing that would offend any tidy-minded engineer!” Read More ›
Darwin statue 2

What Your Biology Teacher Didn’t Tell You

Here are unauthorized answers to questions posed by Jerry Coyne's blog. Read More ›
firing squad

Symposium? Or Firing Squad?

A symposium implies a diversity of perspectives with at least the reasonable hope of open minds, everyone arguing freely, and no one held back or held down while others pummel him. Read More ›
University of Chicago campus

The (Ir)religious Theory of Evolution – A Darwinist Gets Called Out

University of Chicago evolutionist Jerry Coyne suffers from cognitive dissonance. Read More ›
Wilson Darwin

A.N. Wilson Is Right: “Darwin Was Wrong”

I enjoyed Wilson's book, and I learned a lot from it. But this biography’s most interesting feature is its firm rejection of Darwin’s theory of evolution. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute