On Protein Origins, Getting to the Root of Our Disagreement with James Shapiro

_{Douglas Axe
January 20, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

It's as though most scientists are unwilling to put these fundamental ideas to a serious test. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jay W. Richards

Date
January 20, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Alvin Plantinga, Ann Gauger, Doug Axe, evolution, intelligent design, James Shapiro, religion, science, William A. Dembski}

Plantinga on Where the Conflict Really Lies

_{Jay W. Richards
January 20, 2012

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

1}

Anyone interested in the dialogue between science and religion needs to read Alvin Plantinga's new book. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Flannery

Date
January 19, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Alfred Russel Wallace, Ann Gauger, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Heretic (Alfred Wallace), Darwinian evolution, Douglas Axe, intelligent design, James Shapiro, plagiarism, proteins}

Darwin Plagiarism Charge Resurfaces in Time for Alfred Russel Wallace Documentary and Debate

_{Michael Flannery
January 19, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Wallace would break from Darwin in 1869 and develop a theory of intelligent evolution that in many ways presaged modern intelligent design theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
James A. Shapiro

Date
January 18, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, Darwinian evolution, Douglas Axe, evolution, James Shapiro, proteins, speciation, TalkOrigins}

A Response to Ann Gauger’s and Douglas Axe’s Comments

_{James A. Shapiro
January 18, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Continuing a conversation initiated by Bill Dembski ("Is James Shapiro a Design Theorist?")... Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Douglas Axe

Date
January 17, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, David Barash, Douglas Axe, economics, evolution, intelligent design, James Shapiro, science}

Let Science Be the Arbiter: A Reply to James Shapiro

_{Douglas Axe
January 17, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

If Shapiro holds that the answers to the great questions of biology all reside in the material components of life and their arrangement, then he must realize this to be just another philosophical position. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
August 29, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, James Shapiro, natural genetic engineering}

James Shapiro’s Evolution: A View from the 21st Century Offers a Stunning Look at Biological Complexity and Non-Darwinian Evolution

_{Casey Luskin
August 29, 2011

Evolution

15}

Shapiro is not a promoter of the classical modern neo-Darwinian model of evolution. Rather, he believes that in a sense, biological organisms are programmed to evolve. Read More ›