Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

Darwin’s Doubt

geological-sample-with-small-shells-stockpack-adobe-stock.jpg
Geological sample with small shells
Image Credit: mettus - Adobe Stock

More on Small Shelly Fossils and the Length of the Cambrian Explosion: A Concluding Response to Charles Marshall

In my previous replies to Marshall's review in Science of Darwin's Doubt, I've responded to his critiques of the main argument of the book. Read More ›

On the Medved Show’s Science & Culture Update, We’ll Be Talking Today About the Critical Reception of Darwin’s Doubt

It would be very welcome to hear some smart Darwinist call up the show and try to tell Steve Meyer why the case his book makes doesn't hold water. Step right up, guys. Read More ›

Does Darwin’s Doubt Commit the God-of-the-Gaps Fallacy?

According to Charles Marshall, I argue "that paleontologists are unable to explain the Cambrian explosion, thus opening the door to the possibility of a designer's intervention." Read More ›

To Build New Animals, No New Genetic Information Needed? More in Reply in Charles Marshall

To rebut the central argument of Darwin's Doubt, Marshall must deny (or push from view) what we know about what new forms of animal life require as a condition of their existence. Read More ›

A Taxonomy of Evasion: Reviewing the Reviewers of Darwin’s Doubt

For his review in Science of Stephen Meyer's Darwin's Doubt, UC Berkeley paleontologist Charles Marshall wins a prize. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute